A couple of observations -
From the article: "Goode [a USGA 'spokesman'] would not offer specifics about the USGA's labor contracts, but he said the tournament was expected to bring between $100 million and $125 million to the area and to draw about 170,000 people."
The boosters in my burg, Charlotte, frequently throw out economic impact figures for conventions, sporting events, stadium-building, halls of fame, and so on. And just about as frequently they are off the mark. Even those based on "studies" by local university "professors." One problem is that sometimes (not always) they are using gross spending numbers only, without taking into account that a lot of those dollars are simply local dollars diverted from other uses. So, I'm not saying Mr. Goode is off the mark. I'm just saying that his raw numbers are meaningless to me without a detailed explanation of how they were derived.
Also from the article: "According to Darren Bonass, a union representative, the USGA said it had standing contracts with out-of-state companies to set up bleachers, tents, and scaffolding. 'They even have to build a bridge,' Bonass said. 'That's our work. This is our jurisdiction.' Bonass said that the union was still in talks with the USGA and that the organization had indicated it could hire union carpenters for some of the work. 'Union or nonunion, there will be almost no local craftspeople involved with this project,' Bonass said. 'If you're going to hold an event like this and disrupt a community, people should be making money from it.'"
Well, according to Mr. Goode, $100 million plus will be spent in the area. Surely some of that will end up in local hands. The union is simply concerned, as it should be, that its local members won't be getting much, if any, direct economic benefit from the tournament. So, they should do what they are doing - working on the problem. Should the USGA and the Merion club care about the union members? From Merion's standpoint, that's a local issue for them. If any Merion members read this post, I'd be curious to hear their point of view on "benefiting locals," including the union workers in question. Obviously this is not now an issue for the USGA - they have a business model and will go local only to the extent it benefits their business. ["Marion" edited to "Merion" 2 April 2013. CJ]