Was your level of anticipation skewed, as you noted, by the quantity of GCAers that made the recommendation or a general distrust of a commoners opinion?
Mike,
At the time I posted that, only 3-4 posters had rated Waverley as a "must see", and I was reading that as relative to the other courses in Portland. Jeff Mingay was the only one who went further, and now that I've seen it, I'd agree with pretty much everything he wrote about it.
Through your work, you have educated (or conditioned) many on this website. It's no surprise to me that they would recommend a course that you would find enjoyable and worthwhile of a visit.
Well, if you're going to go that route, the architect who restored the course and the shaper who built the bunkers each got their start in the business working for me. And they seem to have learned well! But, I was equally impressed by what they had to work with. The course is much more sophisticated than anything else I've seen of Egan's [though I admit I haven't seen much], and it's a really dramatic piece of real estate, too.