Is the thread a curiosity, or can we run with it to some nether region of GCA? What does it matter, beyond curiosity, what the par-centric configuration of the course/nines is/are?
Note to threaders: this is not I being a prick; this is I asking a probing question.
Happy VD.
I think finishing the nines with multiple par 5s is fairly interesting from a few standpoints:
- First, in a match play scenario, you have more strategic choices of aggressive vs conservative to try and make up ground / protect a lead. I suppose the same potential for movement would apply in a stroke play tournament as well.
- Second, most people think of Par 5s as scoring opportunities. While playing your own ball, "looking forward" to a strong finish at the end of each 9 is interesting.
- As for the 8/9 finish, since many courses may host afternoon 9 hole leagues, having a dramatic 8/9 finish could be just as important as the finish on 17/18. The same logic would apply for Nassau matches.
In our region, we come pretty close at Coudersport Golf Club, which has:
#7 - Short Par 5 with pond fronting a tight green (3-8 is in play)
#8 - 90 degree, drivable Par 4 with OB on inside of dogleg (2-7 easily in play)
#9 - Mid par 5, without much trouble (reachable with 2 solid shots)
#17 - Mid-Long Par 5 with 2 very good shots (OB left off tee)
#18 - Short Par 5, easily reachable if you flirt with OB inside dogleg
I always looked forward to the closing stretches at this course knowing a birdie-birdie finish was not out of the question.
Having said all that, I wouldn't expect an architect to go out of his way to create this type of finish. However, if it happens, I like the anticipation / drama that can occur in those closing holes.