Bogey:
The hole by hole match play, while interesting, fails because it does not match up similar holes. To compare a par 3 against a par 4 or 5 is not really an equitable exercise.
There was an ill-fated thread a while back that attempted to walk through your analysis for PB and PD (
http://www.golfclubatlas.com/forum/index.php/topic,48499.0.html).
On that thread I offered up a like-hole match play scenario, as follows (feel free to disagree where you deem fit):
PB holes are noted first.
Opening Par 4 -
1 v. 1 - PD by a mile, as an opener it really sets the table for what's to come
Par 3's -
5 v. 5 or 14 - PD with either hole
7 v. 11 - Draw, how could you pick (if someone wants to make the history argument, PB might squeak ahead)
12 v. 17 - PD - the movement on this green wins out
17 v. 10 - PB - who hasn't re-enacted the Watson chip their first round on PB - bonus if you can re-enact the Nicklaus tee-ball
Short Par 4's -
3 v. 9 (lower green) - PB by a nose
4 v. 16 - PD, the angles decide it here
8 v. 6 - the two iconic par 4's, has to be a Draw
11 or 15 v. 8 - PD wins against either
Long Par 4's -
9 v. 13 - Draw
10 v. 4 - Draw
13 v. 2 - PD
16 v. 7 - as good a test as the hole in Monterrey provides, 7 at PD is better
Par 5's -
2 v. 12 - PD (just a bit more going on)
6 v. 3 - Draw
14 v. 15 - PB
Closing Par 5 -
18 v. 18 - PB - I'd rather finish with a shot at birdie than the feeling I just got the piss beat out of me
Final tally - PD 8, PB 4, 5 holes halved