This thread is the inverse (converse?) of Dan Jenkins' 1966 book about the Greatest 18 Holes in Golf?
Question: Does "worst" hole have to mean a "bad" hole in somebody's opinion?
The reason I ask is that there is one hole at Pine Valley that, IMO, if it were not at PVGC and didn't "look" like PVGC, it would NOT likely be considered the best hole at most every other course in the US of A. However, it's not a "bad" hole, at all. In fact, from the new back tee, it's hard as hell. But, IMO, if you stripped away how it looks, and put it on any other course, there would probably be other holes that were "better".
Let's call it the "least distinctive".