News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.


John Chilver-Stainer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Is the “Ease of Maintenance” argument valid at the Old Course?
« Reply #25 on: December 10, 2012, 07:12:11 AM »
If one looks at the different cutting units in landscaping maintenance or agriculture there are a number of different products available. Some adaptation for wide slick tyres maybe necessary.

“necessity is the mother of invention”.

Jeff_Brauer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Is the “Ease of Maintenance” argument valid at the Old Course?
« Reply #26 on: December 10, 2012, 08:02:57 AM »
John,

True that.  About 20 years ago, I heard Tom Fazio at a golf show make the same argument about the modern designs of JN, Pete Dye, and others and within a few years, there were mowers that could more easily mow steep banks.  It seems like the banks at TOC couldn't be much steeper than a Pete Dye bunker bank or set of moguls.
Jeff Brauer, ASGCA Director of Outreach

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back