News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Oakmont
« on: August 03, 2012, 11:56:42 AM »
Had the pleasure of playing Oakmont earlier this week. Wow.
No breather holes. No breather shots.
A few images for addicts like me.

#9 with the clubhouse behind.


Behind #18


The big putting green.


The downhill 12th. A truly great hole.


#11 from the left side.


#17. My favorite hole. Carry oblivion to get the right angle. Play safe right and hit over a big bunker to a sliver of a green. Perfect.


#18 from left of the 17th green. What can one say?


#2 Plenty of options. Plenty of danger.


#5 Small undulating green. Precision is required.


#6 Sets into the land nicely.


#8 A 100 yard long bunker on a long par 3.


#9 A 4 iron away from glory, or a 3 putt if you are me.



« Last Edit: August 03, 2012, 03:51:05 PM by Jeff Taylor »

Peter Pallotta

Re: Oakmont
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2012, 12:18:00 PM »
Thanks much, Jeff.  I know I don't have the right stuff to play Oakmont, because in that photo of #9 my eye gravitates not in joy to the clubhouse or the flag in the wind or even the fairway, but instead lingers in fear and trembling over the rough and the bunkers.

My limitation, not Oakmonts!!

Peter

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2012, 12:23:34 PM »
The fairways are the only chance of survival. Oakmont puts the biggest premium of driving that I have ever experienced.

JLahrman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #3 on: August 03, 2012, 12:50:25 PM »
I can't get over how great this course looks without the trees.

Ben Sims

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #4 on: August 03, 2012, 01:19:26 PM »
I wish more tree-lined classics with good shaping would take cues from Oakmont and Planfield.  The no tree look is so appealing from an aesthetic, playability, and agronomy standpoint. 

As an aside, I must heap praise on Oakmont as a members club.  The camaraderie of the SWAT was cool.

Ronald Montesano

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2012, 01:26:14 PM »
First time seeing Hadrian's Wall...had no idea it existed in western PA. That must be the tea, errr, the turnpike.
Coming in 2024
~Elmira Country Club
~Soaring Eagles
~Bonavista
~Indian Hills
~Maybe some more!!

CJ Carder

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #6 on: August 03, 2012, 01:53:36 PM »
I know a lot of people have Augusta, Pine Valley, Cypress Point, etc atop their "must play before I die" list, but Oakmont has always been my #1 since I joined this website and Ryan Farrow's course tour pre-2007 Open sucked me in. 

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #7 on: August 03, 2012, 01:56:54 PM »
I know a lot of people have Augusta, Pine Valley, Cypress Point, etc atop their "must play before I die" list, but Oakmont has always been my #1 since I joined this website and Ryan Farrow's course tour pre-2007 Open sucked me in. 

George Pazin wrote an amazing series on Oakmont, which I wish was permanently posted as an In My Opinion piece.   Maybe someone could do that.....

Gene Greco

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #8 on: August 03, 2012, 01:58:32 PM »
     Oakmont is as good as any golf course on Earth.

 If I remember correctly there are five par 4s under 400 yards.

 As stated above by JLahrman, if you are not in the correct position off the tee, to some pins you are going to fight for par.

The ambiance of the entire club is understated and relaxed.

Chrisitian and I shot 67 best ball from the 6600 yard tees. It was an 18 hole perfect ham and egg. I was about a 9 or a 10 at the time, Christian a 2. When we stood on the 13th tee I noted to him we were dormie in our match against the member and his guest (both 5s), something the member overheard. I was immediately met with a glare. I then turned to Christian and said,"Take a good look around."

After a few drinks, the member brought us into the card room and went through many leather bound books trying to find any of the Swat Matches held among single digits at Oakmont which matched our score. After half an hour the member gave up and we headed down for one last beer.

I love Oakmont and have stayed out of the Huckaby-Pazin battles of yesteryear comparing OM to Pebble (love that one, too).

"...I don't believe it is impossible to build a modern course as good as Pine Valley.  To me, Sand Hills is just as good as Pine Valley..."    TOM DOAK  November 6th, 2010

PCCraig

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #9 on: August 03, 2012, 02:00:03 PM »
I can't get over how great this course looks without the trees.

About 1000x better.
H.P.S.

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #10 on: August 03, 2012, 02:24:52 PM »
I know a lot of people have Augusta, Pine Valley, Cypress Point, etc atop their "must play before I die" list, but Oakmont has always been my #1 since I joined this website and Ryan Farrow's course tour pre-2007 Open sucked me in. 

George Pazin wrote an amazing series on Oakmont, which I wish was permanently posted as an In My Opinion piece.   Maybe someone could do that.....

I never compiled it into the right format. Here is a link to the threads, this was the final summary thread :

Summary thoughts on Oakmont - please add yours

I haven't checked recently to see if the pics still are active. I think mine are, don't know about Ryan's.

Great pics, Jeff T, thanks for sharing them. You opened with my favorite view on the course, nicely done!
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Ben Sims

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2012, 02:44:32 PM »
    Oakmont is as good as any golf course on Earth.

 If I remember correctly there are five par 4s under 400 yards.

 As stated above by JLahrman, if you are not in the correct position off the tee, to some pins you are going to fight for par.

The ambiance of the entire club is understated and relaxed.

Chrisitian and I shot 67 best ball from the 6600 yard tees. It was an 18 hole perfect ham and egg. I was about a 9 or a 10 at the time, Christian a 2. When we stood on the 13th tee I noted to him we were dormie in our match against the member and his guest (both 5s), something the member overheard. I was immediately met with a glare. I then turned to Christian and said,"Take a good look around."

After a few drinks, the member brought us into the card room and went through many leather bound books trying to find any of the Swat Matches held among single digits at Oakmont which matched our score. After half an hour the member gave up and we headed down for one last beer.

I love Oakmont and have stayed out of the Huckaby-Pazin battles of yesteryear comparing OM to Pebble (love that one, too).



Thanks for echoing my sentiments Gene.  Oakmont must be the most unpretentious top 10 club in the nation. 

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #12 on: August 03, 2012, 03:06:51 PM »
Thanks for looking and commenting folks. The one thing that stands out in my mind is that every shot required a plan. There was never a chance to say "just hit it".

Bill_Yates

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #13 on: August 03, 2012, 03:18:19 PM »
I read this quote a number of years ago. I'm not sure who said it but I think it sums up Oakmont's position in golf.

"With the exception of St Andrews, it is the oldest course in the world where national championships are still being played."
Bill Yates
www.pacemanager.com 
"When you manage the pace of play, you manage the quality of golf."

Cliff Walston

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #14 on: August 03, 2012, 03:37:12 PM »
I am guessing everyone had a moment where they really started developing a keen interest in architecture.  For me, it was attending the US Open at Oakmont in 2007.  I was totally awestruck by the course.  I knew it was a famous course in Pittsburgh, but not much more than that.  I came back and starting researching Oakmont and came upon Ran's review of it on this site.  That was the beginning of really studying the architectural merit of courses and holes for me.  Bought Doak's Anatomy of a Golf Course, and its been an obsession ever since.  Still dream of teeing it up there someday.  Like CJ, its been my #1 must play ever since.  Congrats on playing it and thanks for sharing the pictures.

Cliff 

David Davis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #15 on: August 03, 2012, 03:53:05 PM »
Bill, don't believe everything you read. Certainly nothing against Oakmont but if you consider The Open (British Open) a national championship then there are few other courses in the Open rota that predate Oakmont. Namely all of them...

Oakmont - 1903

Scotland

Muirfield - 1891
Carnoustie - 1857
Royal Troon - 1878
Turnberry - 1902

England

Royal St. Georges - 1887
Royal Birkdale - 1897
Royal Lytham & St. Annes - 1886
Royal Liverpool - 1868

Australia

Australian Open is played at Royal Melbourne:

Royal Melbourne - 1901 (although completely changed in 1931

There are likely others as well in other countries.
Sharing the greatest experiences in golf.

IG: @top100golftraveler
www.lockharttravelclub.com

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #16 on: August 03, 2012, 04:12:40 PM »
David, I believe you are talking more about clubs than courses, as your parenthetical remark on Melbourne alludes.

Still, I think Bill's comment was more about the spirit that he intends than the literal truth of it.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Jeff Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #17 on: August 03, 2012, 04:25:15 PM »
A few final images.









« Last Edit: August 03, 2012, 04:31:47 PM by Jeff Taylor »

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #18 on: August 03, 2012, 04:44:07 PM »
First time seeing Hadrian's Wall...had no idea it existed in western PA. That must be the tea, errr, the turnpike.

 :) It is indeed. You should see it from the road - they painted it with levels, to make it look like it had been carved out of the stone, ala the various levels of the Grand Canyon and other such natural features. Kinda funny, kinda sad.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Bob_Huntley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #19 on: August 03, 2012, 09:21:29 PM »


Talking of Oakmont reminds me 'of one of the best amateurs with whom I played. Frank Souchak was a member at Oakmont and won the Club Championship in 1947, '48, '50 '51 '55 and '56. I believe he did at one time, lead the 1953 Open for  a while finishing tenth behind Ben Hogan.

Frank was a strong man and his steel shafts came out at something like an E Nine,

Bob

Michael George

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #20 on: August 03, 2012, 09:28:51 PM »
I love Oakmont, but be clear - it is one difficult and penal golf course.  You miss your drive by 5-10 yards right or left and it is a one stroke penalty as the bunkers are really severe.  Best way to describe it is penal and uncompromising and the club is just fine with that.  I really don't think it is a golf course for an average or below average  golfer (even though it is not that long).  

While the golf is great, what I love most about Oakmont is the clubhouse.  It is just a very special feeling to always look up and see that amazing clubhouse among the fescue and clear summer sky.  And the locker room with the old benches with the old metal spike marks in them and old school feel.  Just special.

However, it is much more pretentious than Sand Hills in terms of top 10.  While it may be less pretentious than ANGC, PV, CPC, Shinny and NGLA, nothing compares to Sand Hills and the general welcome nature of the place.    


 
"First come my wife and children.  Next comes my profession--the law. Finally, and never as a life in itself, comes golf" - Bob Jones

cary lichtenstein

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #21 on: August 04, 2012, 08:35:20 PM »
What I loved most about Oakmont was walking off the 18th green...never to return
Live Jupiter, Fl, was  4 handicap, played top 100 US, top 75 World. Great memories, no longer play, 4 back surgeries. I don't miss a lot of things about golf, life is simpler with out it. I miss my 60 degree wedge shots, don't miss nasty weather, icing, back spasms. Last course I played was Augusta

Patrick_Mucci

Re: Oakmont
« Reply #22 on: August 04, 2012, 11:18:30 PM »
I wish more tree-lined classics with good shaping would take cues from Oakmont and Planfield.  The no tree look is so appealing from an aesthetic, playability, and agronomy standpoint. 

Ben,

It is VERY difficult to convince memberships that their course will be improved by the removal of trees
They just can't visualize the "after" look and play.

Ridgewwod in NJ, which had become narrow over the years is currently engaged in this tug of war.

Hollywood and Mountain Ridge removed a good number of trees and the courses are healthier and play better, and, the WIND is more of a factor.

Shinnecock has undertaken a significant tree removal program and the course looks incredible, and the wind is even more of a factor.

Slowly, more and more clubs are starting to get it.

As an aside, I must heap praise on Oakmont as a members club.  The camaraderie of the SWAT was cool.

Gene Greco

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #23 on: August 05, 2012, 12:23:31 AM »
What I loved most about Oakmont was walking off the 18th green...never to return

Did you play in the US Open?
"...I don't believe it is impossible to build a modern course as good as Pine Valley.  To me, Sand Hills is just as good as Pine Valley..."    TOM DOAK  November 6th, 2010

Bill McKinley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Oakmont
« Reply #24 on: August 05, 2012, 09:22:37 AM »
I feel I must comment on a couple things on this thread...

Cary,

I cannot fathom anyone having your viewpoint about Oakmont.  Yes it's hard, but I've played courses that are harder.  But I find it very fun to play, even though it is difficult. 

Michael,

I agree with your thoughts on Oakmont being much less pretentious than other top 10 venues.  There is a great vibe about the place with the SWAT room, as Patrick mentioned, and that really makes you want to come back again!

The wow factor is one of the best i've experienced, standing on the putting green and getting ready to tee off.  The expanse that's in front of you is so impressive.  Again, as many have said before the no tree look makes it stand out even more.  The 15th hole may be my favorite on the course.  The blind tee shot, the cant of the fairway and the amazing greensite that will give the player lots of options on how to play the approach.

Great pics too Jeff!  Thanks for posting
2016 Highlights:  Streamsong Blue (3/17); Streamsong Red (3/17); Charles River Club (5/16); The Country Club - Brookline (5/17); Myopia Hunt Club (5/17); Fishers Island Club (5/18); Aronomink GC (10/16); Pine Valley GC (10/17); Somerset Hills CC (10/18)