Rick Shefchik writes:
Just a guess, but I believe most of those who vehemently object to carts under any circumstances are relatively young and sturdy, whereas those who would like to see at least a limited use of carts are older and creakier.Even when I was young, few would have ever called me sturdy. Now I'm neither young or sturdy.
I think carts have been bad for golf. I love that there is one place in the U.S. that actively discourages cartball. Yes, life would be easier if I could ride a cart around during a second round. Life would also be easier if I just played my rounds at a golf simulator. Neither are golf, but both are reasonable facsimiles of golf.
For those of you oldsters like myself and Rick, there are numerous solutions to making walking the second 18 easier. As Mr. Johnson mentioned earlier, lighten your bag. No rule says you have to lug around 14 clubs. Try playing with 5-6, you'll be shocked how light the bag is. Also for those little aches and pains, Oregon is a medical cannabis state.
It does seem to be an American thing: It isn't up to the individual to change, but rather the institution should change to fit the individual. How many whining about how tough it is to play 36 holes on foot have ever tried reducing the number of clubs they carry?
Cheers,
Dan King
The emblem on the necktie reserved for the members of the Royal and Ancient Golf Club of St. Andrews -- The Vatican of golf -- is of St. Andrew himself bearing the slatier cross on which, once he was captured at Patras, he was to be stretched before he was crucified. Only the Scots would have thought of celebrating a national game with the figure of a tortured saint.
--Alister Cooke