News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
I have never been more furious with myself than when I realised -- at 30,000ft and half-way to Melbourne on my recent trip -- that I had forgotten my camera. So I was reduced to crappy smartphone pics of the new courses I was playing -- if anyone has pics of Thirteenth Beach, please post them here!

One of the great things about courses from the 1800s and the first third of the 20th Century is how regularly they feature something unexpected -- often utilising a landform or natural feature that too often in the modern era would be manipulated, filled or flattened.

Thirteenth Beach came to life alongside Barwon Heads GC less than a decade ago, designed by Tony Cashmore, and takes its name from the beach named after its neighbour course's fantastic back nine drop-shot par three.

Despite being so new, the course features regular surprises in the way the land is used that would evoke feelings of the Golden Age were it not for the surplus bunkers on almost every hole that reminds you this was built in the era of ample access to earthmoving.

Too regularly there are two or three bunkers where one would suffice and in the unfortunate example of the par five 14th, ridiculous "mushrooms" that litter an otherwise imposing hillside drive bunker. That detracts significantly from a hazard that could have been a real feature, the way similar sprawling excavations are highlights of the 1st, 9th and 17th.

Perhaps if Cashmore had been forced to dig all his bunkers himself with a shovel, that largesse could have been avoided...

But it's important not to get too hung up on the overload of bunkering, because there is so much to like about the golf course, not least of all the way it uses some wonderful, sandy seaside land and maximises the lesser areas of the property with features like the strategically strong par four 2nd hole (despite the overbunkered drive), imaginative par five 4th -- which wraps around a natural salt lake -- and the sunken, multi-tier 18th green that plays visual games and demands absolute precision.


The green of the par five 4th has an open front for those approaching in two shots, but is still a testing target, pushed up slightly and well-shaped, for someone hitting a wedge for their third shot


The home hole is away from the rugged seaside dunes, but the bold bunkers help to tie it and the other inland holes together with those in the best land, while the sunken, multi-tiered green is one of the most interesting on the course

Highlights in the better land include the smartly-bunkered par five 11th, with the added interest of a small crossing dune and centreline bunker at the natural lay-up zone 90-100m from the green as well as a three highly memorable par threes that utilise some of the best terrain on the course.

The 7th drops steeply to a clover-shaped bowl green more than 150m away, with the length and reliable impact of wind combining to add interest, while once on the green there's tremendous benefit to hitting the same section of green as the pin.

Of greatest interest at the 12th -- also about 150m -- is the way the green wraps around its fronting bunkers, while the way it sits against a hillside of natural scrub is also a highlight.

But there can be no doubt in identifying the best one-shotter: the 16th, which weighs in at less than 110m from the back tee and is likely to be under three figures most days. Like the 7th at Barnbougle Dunes just across Bass Strait, it's a tantalising mix of humble length and treacherous green, bunkered boldly to the left and with a fronting slope that will reject tentative approaches. What's even more magnificent here is its placement so late in the round, necessitating deft touch when nerves are reaching their most raw.


This picture by David Scaletti, from planetgolf.com.au Forgetting my camera and having to rely on a camera phone was a mistake, never moreso than at the 16th, a sensational short par three, so I have borrowed this picture to illustrate what a perfect green it has for a hole of that length

The weaknesses of the 14th have already been mentioned, and the only other real disappointment also comes at a par five -- the 6th being sadly neutered by a forced lay-up drive short of a wetland, with a high, bunkered dune on the right removing a brave drive down the narrow neck of fairway from the list of options. After another dull lay-up it's time to pitch to a too-busy green. It's disappointing from the tee box to the bottom of the hole.

Underpinning the many great holes -- and making the whole as special as it is -- is the routing, which initially heads inland with smart design over land that while still blessed with movement, lacks the interaction with the dunes and natural vegetation that makes the seaside holes that little bit more memorable. There's then a great run through the dunes at the end of the front side, the aforementioned 7th and two demanding par fours after it creating maybe the toughest stretch on the course. The 10th links you back to the coastline, where the virtues of the course have already been mentioned, heading inland at the 14th before dipping back into the prime land for that great 16th and the 17th -- a par four with natural strengths that are hurt by superfluous bunkering.


The 17th is among the holes that are undoubtedly overbunkered, but its green is well set into the hillside and demands a pinpoint approach

What's most striking is the well-paced flow between inland holes and those on the seaside during the final two-thirds of the course and though the land varies, the quality and character of the holes is remarkably consistent.

Though I've steered clear of it here to focus on this course's qualities, there's an interesting comparison and contrast to be explored between Thirteenth Beach (Beach) and Barwon Heads GC next door -- their strengths and weaknesses are both so varied and their characters so different.

And while Barwon Heads might have a better reputation, I'm  not convinced there's much between the two in terms of quality or -- maybe most importantly -- fun.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2012, 02:50:15 AM by Scott Warren »

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Scott,

I was beginning to wonder if anyone else had ever been here.  My wife and I played it on our trip to Australia three years ago.  I was attracted by the name, some fairly good rankings and the price.  My recollection is liking the holes to the south of the clubhouse and nearer the ocean dunes than the holes on the inland side.

I have lots of pictures.  You can comment on them if you want.  My recollection is a little vague now.

Here's the eponymous 13th beach.




The first hole heading inland.  Many bunkers.







The second hole, a dogleg right par 4 around a nest of bunker.
















The par 3 third hole.







The fourth hole, a par 5 bending left along a salt pond.













The fifth hole, a short par 4 with a forced carry and lots of bunkers..













The sixth hole is a par 5 heading toward the ocean with a neat dell-like green.
















Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
The seventh is a short par 3 turning back to the clubhouse.







The eight is a par 4













The ninth is another par 4 bending right and returning to the clubhouse.













The par 4 tenth goes back out parallel to the 9th and bending left.










The par 5 eleventh is situated in a nice valley in the dunes.













The twelfth is a short par 3.





Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Bryan,

Thanks so much for these pics. Great to see them and it's reminding me of a few things I had forgotten about. Hope to have time to address a few of them at length soon.

We have the Thirteenth Beach GC captain and golf operations mgr among us, so hopefully they might also chime in.

Ben Stephens

  • Karma: +0/-0
Hi Scott,

It is interesting that you have said it was interesting, surprising but over bunkered. Thats the same for me when I played the Dunes, another Tony Cashmore course near St. Andrews Beach. The weather was atrocious - very heavy rain and yet I managed to only play the front nine. I have pics of holes 1-8 if needed.

Also recently the Australian Deaf Golf Championships was recently played at Thirteenth Beach. It was won by Jack Besley (+2) from NSW by a staggering 18 shots and I am up against this guy in Japan! He shot 70 on the Beach in the 3rd round then 66 on the Faldo designed Creek course.

http://www.deafgolfaustralia.com.au

Cheers
Ben
 
« Last Edit: April 24, 2012, 11:34:01 AM by Ben Stephens »

Tyler Kearns

  • Karma: +0/-0
Scott,

I enjoyed my game at 13th Beach when I ventured to Australia, a nice surprise.
Like you, I thought the 16th hole was a wonderful short par-three, not only a hard target to hit given the small plateau green, but trying to keep a short-iron or wedge under the wind in stronger wind conditions adds greatly to the challenge. I also really liked the diagonal carry off of the 5th tee, always a good concept that demands golfers to decide how brave they want to be that day.

I didn't play the adjacent Faldo course, but was told Cashmore's course was the better of the two.

TK

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
The thirteenth is a short par 4 with the tee cut into a dune.










The routing reverses direction to the par 5 fourteenth.




The indigenous fellow travelers.













The fifteenth reverses direction again with a medium length par 4.







The sixteenth is a very short par 3 with a wicked green seen in the first picture from the left side.










The 17th is a longish par 4 that legs hard to the right.













The eighteenth is a medium length par 4 that changes direction yet again.











Paul OConnor

  • Karma: +0/-0
That is one cool looking course!  Thanks for bringing it to GCA.

Brett_Morrissy

  • Karma: +0/-0
Thanks Scott for starting this thread, if I recall correctly it was a beautiful day out on "the links". I enjoyed it very much, and as you say, great fun!
Bryan, glad to hear you enjoyed your time here, but that may be the worst photo ;) I have seen of the actual "13th Beach" beach, unless you are a fan of rocky beaches,( as 13th has miles of wide sandy beach, is an extremely popular surf with the Surf Life Saving Club our neighbour on the top of the dune above the 7th green) and we are fortunate to get to play a golf course that enjoys the "flavours & character" provided by its close proximity to Bass Strait.

As of the past week, the "mushrooms" on 14 are gone, with our shaper Barry Hudson finalising some works to the inside of the slight dog leg, and some subtle contouring on the outside. Will see if we can get some pics up for you.

It is a terriffic place to play golf with two courses that require different approaches to score well, and a club with a two grass policy that is a unique offering in Australia, and we are also most fortunate to have a strong and vibrant club, in both level of golfer and social atmosphere. The golf challenge on offer is always interesting, our value for money is outstanding, and feel very lucky to be part of it.

BM
« Last Edit: April 24, 2012, 07:41:35 PM by Brett Morrissy »
@theflatsticker

Brett_Morrissy

  • Karma: +0/-0
One of the elements I find the most enjoyable is the angles required on many holes, except the P3's of course, where angles are only dictated by tee positions or pin positions. It is always a feeling of defeat when you miss your intended line.

On most if not all the P4's and P5's (unless they have a centerline bunker, 6, 11 and 13 for some golfers) require accuracy and control to position your approach as close as possible to one or more FW Hazards to offer the ideal line to flag on the fast and firm greens.
@theflatsticker

RJ_Daley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2012, 08:28:56 PM »
Is there some kind of 'bunker university' or do your turf science programs have a bunker curriculum?  The Aussies just have a knack for presenting and maintaining their bunkers, it seems to me.  I suppose one may say they have overbunkered the course in the photos.  But, it is sort of like showing off the artistry and signature style, and as long as they are arrayed sensibly to make the course interesting without being overthetop, then that sounds like a fine style to present as something of the national Australian signature. 
No actual golf rounds were ruined or delayed, nor golf rules broken, in the taking of any photographs that may be displayed by the above forum user.

Shane Gurnett

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2012, 11:31:42 PM »
Scott, glad you enjoyed 13th Beach. It's a course I always enjoy playing.

It's typical of Cashmores bunkering style (build 4 or more where one would do the job) and has a similar look to The Dunes on the Mornington Peninsula. The par 3's as a set are pretty good, except for the shocker that is 3, whislt the par 5's are just an average set apart from the standout 11th which is excellent. Overall though it is a very solid track with a lot of interest shots to hit along the way.

As Brett has pointed out, the Club really has a great handle on its turf management, with excellent firm playing surfaces all years round. Something many other more highly ranked courses could learn a lot from.

Ben Jarvis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2012, 12:01:51 AM »
Scott,

Thanks for this thread, highlighting the Beach Course at Thirteenth Beach.

For those that don't know, I have been the Golf Operations Manager at Thirteenth Beach since May 2008. Prior to this role, I worked my way "through the ranks" from day one - November 30, 2001.

Naturally, I am fond of both courses at Thirteenth Beach and personally, feel that of the two courses (Beach and Creek), the Creek Course is the one that provides a sterner test, particularly from the black pegs.

But, this thread is about the Beach Course, a course that needs to be played more than once.

Something that hasn't been mentioned just yet is the "sandy wasteland" that appears throughout the golf course. These areas are not bunkers and the club may be grounded. These areas are found throughout the golf course, most notably on the following holes;

#1: LHS of drive zone
#3: in front of the tee box
#6: RHS of the lay-up zone (approx. 100m from the green)
#9: RHS of the drive zone
#11: LHS of the lay-up zone
#13: LHS of the drive zone
#14: RHS of the drive zone
#15: LHS beyond the diving zone
#17: RHS of the driving zone leading up to the green

Scott, Brett touched on the changes being made to the 14th hole. Here is an image taken on Tuesday 17 April, with works having just commenced.




For those that have not played the Beach Course before, the fairways are a fine fescue, while the greens are Penn G2 Bent. Interestingly, we do not have to core our greens, rather, we dust them every 5-6 weeks and vertidrain twice a year. Generally speaking, the greens are exceptionally smooth and play quite firm year-round.

If anyone is intending on visiting the area and is interested in a game, please feel free to contact me via email.
Twitter: @BennyJarvis
Instagram: @bennyj08

Ben Jarvis

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2012, 12:11:44 AM »
It seems we do things differently down here - apologies for the upside down image. I rotated it on photobucket but clearly hasn't come through correctly.
Twitter: @BennyJarvis
Instagram: @bennyj08

Matt_Cohn

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2012, 12:14:34 AM »


Actually this is in Australia so it's right side up to those of us in North America and Europe.

Bryan Izatt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2012, 03:30:06 AM »
Brett,

Sorry for the poor labeling of the "beach" picture.   :-[  I knew the sand beach was there, the beginning just visible past the rocks.  I could hear the ocean on the course, but of course, could not see it. We took the quick detour on our way out to look for the beach, but obviously didn't go far enough east.  My wife was anxious to get back to St Kilda for dinner and the GPS kept saying "turn around", so off we went.

It was certainly a solid course.  In retrospect, the contouring (natural, I hope) of many of the fairways was very attractive.  The course also played firm and fast despite some rain as we arrived and it being a cool misty day while we played.  Strangely, despite the number of bunkers, I found them quite attractive while intimidating.  They are so unlike most in North America.

Kyle Henderson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #16 on: April 29, 2012, 12:42:46 AM »
Thanks for starting this thread, SW-1.
The “Creek” and “Beach” courses certainly offer enjoyable games of golf on attractively shaped playing fields in majestic settings, with the latter course offering the best on all three counts. But, for my part, the greatest incentive for visiting the Bellarine Peninsula is the prospect of a game with Mr. Morrisey.

Here are some images from my visit in February of 2011.

7


8


10


11


12


12


13


14


15


16


17

"I always knew terrorists hated us for our freedom. Now they love us for our bondage." -- Stephen T. Colbert discusses the popularity of '50 Shades of Grey' at Gitmo

Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #17 on: April 30, 2012, 12:57:30 AM »
Some great pics, Kyle. Thanks for posting. They and Bryan's combine to give a really good indication of the character of the course.

Yours show on 8 and 11 the way some of the bunkering blends beautifully into the native vegeatation.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 01:45:45 AM by Scott Warren »

Brett_Morrissy

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #18 on: April 30, 2012, 01:38:13 AM »
Hey Gunshow - you are welcome anytime.

I would be interested to hear the DG thoughts on this:

Does anyone have any thoughts on SW-1's use of the term "over-bunkered". Certainly comparing our two courses, the other one has much larger bunkers with many bays, and the Beach has a lot more individual bunkering, but not necessarily more hazards as a whole, apart from the wasteland areas obviously (which is infinitely better than water). If a dogleg corner or the right hand side of a green for example, is protected by 3 or 5 bunkers instead of 1 or 2, does that impact the playability of the golf hole?

If a golf hole has an area of the hole that is deemed to be a hazard by the GCA - if that is one large bunker or 3 smaller bunkers, does it really matter?

The smaller bunkers on the Beach course do go someway toward preventing too much wind erosion inside the bunkers from a maintenance perspective.

Could it be the architects style or choice to present the course like this, perhaps mimicking the surrounding frontal dune land with its scrub and bushes with small pockets of sand, as opposed to the wide open expanses of marram grass links?
- and if so, is that a negative?
@theflatsticker

Scott Warren

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #19 on: April 30, 2012, 02:05:14 AM »
To clarify my meaning in use of that word, I am referring to too great an area of bunkers, regardless of how many individual hazards make up that area.

Your point on wind erosion etc is right on and aside from smaller traps meaning more of the bunkered area is close to the front lip and the bunker might therefore be more difficult to escape from, there's not too much difference between a 60sqm bunker and three 20sqm bunkers. Indeed some bunkers (like many at Kingston heath) are shaped in such a way that one trap looks like two or three from a distance.

Re my over-bunkered comment, the areas I'd say that I am referring to are:

2nd hole -- RHS fairway.
4th hole -- RHS greenside.
5th hole -- RHS greenside.
11th hole -- LHS greenside (IMO that side could well be unbunkered)
13th hole -- short-right of the green.
14th hole -- short-right of green.
17th hole -- front-left of green (perhaps one centre-left, or even none at all in that area).

In that set there are only a couple of instances where I think there are bunkers where there shouldn't be any (as noted in brackets), generally I just think the area of bunkering is somewhat excessive.

It's only a relatively minor quibble with what I think is an outstanding golf course, but a fun one to explore and discuss.

I'm a big fan of the waste areas on 1, 3, 6, 9, 11, 13, 15 and 17 -- which I agree work (with great success) to tie in a common character and aesthetic throughout a property where the land varies quite significantly.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 02:18:39 AM by Scott Warren »

Dieter Jones

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #20 on: April 30, 2012, 02:38:44 AM »
I played the Beach course about 7 years ago. I enjoyed the round there. Yes there are some areas I didn't like (eg 6 and 3) but it is certainly well worth playing if you are in the area. I would definitely make the effort to play there again next time i'm on the Bellerine Peninsula.

Funnily I didn't remember it as being overbunkered when I played it apart from a couple of spots like on the hill right at 2?, the bunkers on 5 (both fairway and green side) and one hole on the back which from the pictures above must be 17. My memory of individual bunkers and greenside bunkers in partiucular is not good though. 5th hole I loved the drive but found the green surrounds a bit of a mess so certainly agree with Scott there.

Looking at the pics above 4 RHS looks abit OTT but I think still works on a hole of that length. RHS 5 does look excessive but BM would have a better feel for how it actually plays.
Never argue with an idiot. They will simply bring you down to their level and then beat you with experience.

David_Elvins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Thirteenth Beach (Beach): Interesting, surprising, but over-bunkered
« Reply #21 on: April 30, 2012, 07:46:23 AM »
Thanks  for the photos Scott and Bryan.

i always enjoy a trip down to thirtheenth beach.  I think it is a really good example of how to blend a small amount of good golfing land and a large amount of average golfing land into a really good golf course. 

The first hole is one of my favorite opening holes.  Not to hard for the first hole of the day but good strategic tee shot placement required for a birdie. 

the course is very strong strategically.  A lot of choices to be made and solid simple strategies on offer. 

I agree with those that state that the course is over bunkered.  Every time I visit there seems to be more bunkers.  The more recent  bunkering on the 17th is overdone but is perhaps better than the two scallop like bunkers that used to sit into the face of the wasteland.  The bunker cut into the mound on 6 looks ridiculous and far worse than what was there before.  And the bunkers on the outside of the dogleg on 15 serve little purpose.  In other sots there are two-five bunkers where one-two would suffice. 

the other thing that no-one has mentioned is the abundance of rough on the course.   there arent many courses in the state of victoria that have fescue rough abutting the greens and I thin kthe course is worse from it.  there are many areas where the course has clearly been designed to allow balls to run away from the greens but the thicker grass holds it up and keeps it close to the green with a flop shot the only logical recovery option.  there are also holes such as the tenth where the rough line darts in and out of the fairway for no apparent reason. 

All things considered though, a very solid golf course. 


Brett,

I hope that "subtle contouring on the outside of the dogleg" is not code for containment mounds or screening mounds. 
Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.

Kyle Henderson

  • Karma: +0/-0
When was the rough around the greens grown in? I remember rough bordering the fairways but I also recall paying a great number of green-side recovery shots from tight lies in February of 2011.
"I always knew terrorists hated us for our freedom. Now they love us for our bondage." -- Stephen T. Colbert discusses the popularity of '50 Shades of Grey' at Gitmo

David_Elvins

  • Karma: +0/-0
When was the rough around the greens grown in? I remember rough bordering the fairways but I also recall paying a great number of green-side recovery shots from tight lies in February of 2011.

Kyle,

I think the creek course has tight lies around the greens.  The Beach has had (Fescue?) rough for the last 6-7 years or so.  You can see the rough lines in a few of bryan's photos, such as this one.  Where he land runs away from the green it is more noticable and influences the play a lot more as it keeps balls close to greens.  

Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Maybe its the photo angles, but between the bunkering, mounds and vegetation, this course looks incredibly busy.  I definitely have a strong dislike of the bunkering scheme.  It seems like there was a great deal of opportunity to stick bunkers into natural spots and be interesting - so why does the bunkering look so out of place?

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing