News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Don_Mahaffey

Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #225 on: March 14, 2012, 08:11:54 PM »
Tiger,
How do you feel about so many of the courses that debut well, earning best new this or that, ranked early on, only to disappear later?
Do you have the same concerns for the courses that start with a bang and then go away, as you do for one that was panned early on only to develop a following later?

Doesn't history show that often times, be it good or bad, courses are misjudged while in their infancy? Everyone keeps saying things about this resurgence (and spreading innuendo) but isn't it possible that DR was just hard to accept at first because it was so different then Sand Hills?

I'm left with something Ron W from Golf Digest wrote when he was remembering quotes form Geoff Cornish.
I don't know the exact quote, but Geoff said something like this..."almost every great hole was controversial early on".


John Kavanaugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #226 on: March 14, 2012, 08:16:41 PM »
Critics looked for minimalism and found naturalism. It blew their minds. Their loss. Nicklaus invented a new genre at Dismal which is why I claim it was just too far ahead of its time. We are catching up post by post.

Sven Nilsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #227 on: March 14, 2012, 08:18:27 PM »
Critics looked for minimalism and found naturalism. It blew their minds. Their loss. Nicklaus invented a new genre at Dismal which is why I claim it was just too far ahead of its time. We are catching up post by post.

Could you expound a bit more on the differences between minimalism and naturalism?

I don't believe this was one of my questions in the email, so it should be fair game.
"As much as we have learned about the history of golf architecture in the last ten plus years, I'm convinced we have only scratched the surface."  A GCA Poster

"There's the golf hole; play it any way you please." Donald Ross

John Kavanaugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #228 on: March 14, 2012, 08:24:40 PM »
Critics looked for minimalism and found naturalism. It blew their minds. Their loss. Nicklaus invented a new genre at Dismal which is why I claim it was just too far ahead of its time. We are catching up post by post.

Could you expound a bit more on the differences between minimalism and naturalism?

I don't believe this was one of my questions in the email, so it should be fair game.

Doak has explained mistaken minimalism many times before. I don't have time to do a search currently. I will start a thread on it next week.

Sven Nilsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #229 on: March 14, 2012, 08:34:16 PM »
Chris:

Sounds like 4 and 18 present some strategic options.  

I'd love to see a separate thread that went through every hole and examined the penal, strategic, heroic and other design aspects of each, with hole diagrams and pictures.  In my mind, this would greatly help in accepting the "its just fun" analysis that has permeated Dismal discussions in the past.  I've read through Eric's 2010 photo thread, but without the hole by hole focus a bit of the analysis gets lost in the process.

Unfortunately, I'm not in a position now where I foresee traveling to Mullen (or any other remote golf location) for quite some time.  If those that do get the chance to visit would humor those of us that cannot with their patience and input, I'm sure we'd greatly appreciate a detailed look into the merits of the course.

Sven
"As much as we have learned about the history of golf architecture in the last ten plus years, I'm convinced we have only scratched the surface."  A GCA Poster

"There's the golf hole; play it any way you please." Donald Ross

Kalen Braley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #230 on: March 14, 2012, 08:45:32 PM »
Sven,

The basic jist of the difference between naturalism and minimalism is:  (And I know this is a gross generalization but as I understand it):

Minimalism actually means you moved very little dirt in making a course, whereas naturalism means it only looks like you moved very little dirt.

P.S  In about 4 months you're going to have more commentary/pictures/opinions on DR than you can shake a stick at.   ;)

John Kavanaugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #231 on: March 14, 2012, 08:50:54 PM »
Sven,

The basic jist of the difference between naturalism and minimalism is:  (And I know this is a gross generalization but as I understand it):

Minimalism actually means you moved very little dirt in making a course, whereas naturalism means it only looks like you moved very little dirt.

P.S  In about 4 months you're going to have more commentary/pictures/opinions on DR than you can shake a stick at.   ;)

You have it bass ackwards

JESII

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #232 on: March 14, 2012, 09:31:43 PM »
Not according to Doak from a year or two ago...

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #233 on: March 14, 2012, 09:43:24 PM »
Don that is also an interesting discussion. It is one that we find fairly often. There are different reasons. One is that it was over hyped to begin with. 2. another is they club did a great job of promoting it to the media as well as hiding its negatives. 3 The maintenance team or ownership or both lost the initial vision and let the course go in a different direction which effect ed change in the character of the course. There are others but i will leave that to professionals like you who see these things from the inside. Don I am not going to comment on DR anymore other than to say I do not agree it was because it was different than Sand Hills. Ballyneal  is different than Sand Hills yet it is generally considered a great course. I do not think it was just because it was a Jack course either. Jack has many highly regarded courses. The knock on jack is his percentage of great courses is low as compared to the number of courses built and the high quality of sites he had to work with.  However I am not able to really point to why in the DR case. I can only say what I was told by others I respect. And that will not serve this site well. So no reason to go there.
« Last Edit: March 14, 2012, 09:58:21 PM by Tiger_Bernhardt »

Don_Mahaffey

Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #234 on: March 14, 2012, 10:10:59 PM »
Tiger,
 to each his own, I respect your beliefs.
My only question, if that's always been your reasoning, why the false interest in DR?

I do hope you get well soon. I enjoyed our day at Barona and it was far too long ago.

Tiger_Bernhardt

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #235 on: March 14, 2012, 10:58:00 PM »
Don thanks I actually do have genuine interest in DR. I would not have asked so many questions or put such a high value on the opportunity this topic offers. My initial feelings about DR were not based as much in fact as reputation. So I was looking forward to the opportunity to learn. I do hope our paths cross soon as well. cheers

Sven Nilsen

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #236 on: March 15, 2012, 01:07:51 AM »
Jim:

I believe this is Tom's quote in reference to his work on the Rawls Course:

"So, I wouldn't label it minimalism ... I would call that naturalist, in the sense that we tried to make it look real even though it isn't."

Here is Kyle Phillips' take:

“Naturalism uses existing natural landforms, but also – where the landforms might be devoid of character – allows for a natural looking shaping to be created, and then the holes to be overlaid this new, but natural looking and feeling landscape,” he explains. “The end result still looks and plays like what naturally was there, but we were able to make it more interesting – and most importantly strategic – than what was previously there.”

John:

I'm guessing that is not what you meant.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2012, 01:23:05 AM by Sven Nilsen »
"As much as we have learned about the history of golf architecture in the last ten plus years, I'm convinced we have only scratched the surface."  A GCA Poster

"There's the golf hole; play it any way you please." Donald Ross

Sean_A

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #237 on: March 15, 2012, 02:53:36 AM »
Critics looked for minimalism and found naturalism. It blew their minds. Their loss. Nicklaus invented a new genre at Dismal which is why I claim it was just too far ahead of its time. We are catching up post by post.

Jeepers JakaB - get on a plane and go to the UK.  A simple trip like this would prevent you from making such silly pronouncements.

Ciao
New plays planned for 2024: Nothing

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #238 on: March 15, 2012, 08:06:54 AM »

How do you feel about so many of the courses that debut well, earning best new this or that, ranked early on, only to disappear later?
Do you have the same concerns for the courses that start with a bang and then go away, as you do for one that was panned early on only to develop a following later?


Don,

This is an excellent point and one of my biggest pet peeves.  I'd much prefer a course that gains traction over time to the flash in the pan.  I'd love to see the statistics on percentage of courses in Golfweek's Modern list that have a higher ranking 5 years later than when they debuted vs. those that came out of the gate in the top 100 only to drift off the list completely over the years.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2012, 08:09:12 AM by Jud Tigerman »
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Richard Choi

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #239 on: March 15, 2012, 11:34:25 AM »
Jud, that is a natural by-product of not enough people playing the course when it first debuts. You know well as I do (we just had this discussion not long ago), when you have fewer samples, you are more likely to have wider deviation from standard mean.

The only thing that will solve that problem is to require higher number of ratings before a course can debut. Whether or not that is desirable, I dont know as I like knowing about the new courses within a year.

Jud_T

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #240 on: March 15, 2012, 11:41:49 AM »
Richard,

Agreed.  However the distribution of these variations seems skewed dramatically in favor of overrating new courses rather than underrating.  This is not explained by sample size...
Golf is a game. We play it. Somewhere along the way we took the fun out of it and charged a premium to be punished.- - Ron Sirak

Jim Colton

Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #241 on: March 15, 2012, 12:00:17 PM »
Jud,

  I agree with you. Well hyped courses tend to start off high and settle in over time. Old Macdonald's rank stayed the same, but its points have come down significantly relative to last year. It's probably because those that played it in 2010 probably specifically seeked it out, and I'd bet have a higher propensity to enjoy it. I haven't looked at the numbers, but I'd bet Whistling Straits and Bandon Dunes are two other examples. On the flip side, Friars Head seems like a course that will drift up and thrive over the test of time.

Anthony Gray

Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #242 on: March 15, 2012, 12:03:19 PM »


  I still haven't heard how the new owners have changed ththe club which is part of the original question. Why is it more successful now as opposed to the begining?

  Anthony


Mac Plumart

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #243 on: March 15, 2012, 12:19:20 PM »
In all seriousness, I think Adam Clayman's input on this thread has been fantastic and provides many of the answers Jim was seeking.

Thanks Adam!
Sportsman/Adventure loving golfer.

Richard Choi

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #244 on: March 15, 2012, 01:29:50 PM »
Jud, I fully expect the variation to be favorable since people who are most excited about the new course are the ones most likely to make plans to visit the new course early.

The opposite case for Dismal makes sense since people who were excited to visit it when it first opened were looking for something just like Sand Hills and were disappointed when it was not. The same fact probably did not affect Ballyneal since it was Doak and people were setting their expectations closer to Pacific Dune and not Sand Hills.

Anthony Gray

Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #245 on: March 15, 2012, 01:31:06 PM »
In all seriousness, I think Adam Clayman's input on this thread has been fantastic and provides many of the answers Jim was seeking.

Thanks Adam!

  ?


Tom_Doak

  • Karma: +2/-1
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #246 on: March 15, 2012, 01:31:56 PM »
Jud, I fully expect the variation to be favorable since people who are most excited about the new course are the ones most likely to make plans to visit the new course early.

The opposite case for Dismal makes sense since people who were excited to visit it when it first opened were looking for something just like Sand Hills and were disappointed when it was not. The same fact probably did not affect Ballyneal since it was Doak and people were setting their expectations closer to Pacific Dune and not Sand Hills.

Richard:

Ballyneal was not highly rated when it opened, either.  Made #6 on the GOLF DIGEST list of best private courses that year.  Now ranked above all of the ones that finished above it.

Terry Lavin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #247 on: March 15, 2012, 01:35:47 PM »
In all seriousness, I joined Dismal River sight unseen, based on information I gleaned from this site, principally the fact that Tom Doak is building a second course that looks like it might be sensational.  All of these threads, however, are making me consider remaining in the "sight unseen" category.  It's a real turn-off.
Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people.  H.L. Mencken

Richard Choi

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #248 on: March 15, 2012, 01:38:01 PM »
Tom, that was mostly due to conditioning issues, no? By 2008, Ballyneal was #13 on Golfweek modern, so that situation was pretty quickly rectified.

John Kavanaugh

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Dismal River: A Case Study
« Reply #249 on: March 15, 2012, 01:49:12 PM »
In all seriousness, I joined Dismal River sight unseen, based on information I gleaned from this site, principally the fact that Tom Doak is building a second course that looks like it might be sensational.  All of these threads, however, are making me consider remaining in the "sight unseen" category.  It's a real turn-off.

I agree 100%. I hope no one starts the hole by hole strategic review those who just want to learn have requested. This will be my last post about Dismal until Easter.  Being the most talked about course on the planet may not be all it seems.

All I ask is that those who have never been there is to not bait me until noon on Good Friday. That will give me three days to formulate a response.

I have always thought giving something up for lent was Dismal.

Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back