Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.
Interesting to read of Geoff's love for the 16th at St. Andrews Beach. That hole was pointed to as the weakest on the course by several Aussies with whom I spoke. Of course, the weakest hole at SAB is probably better than the best holes on most courses.
I have not understood the lack of love for #16 at St Andrew's Beach.
MarkI could have guessed that the call re: 16th at SAB would have prickled with you
Am I the only dude who cannot access his site? At home or at work, I type in the URL and I get a simple "No Access" text message in the upper left corner of my browser. Thoughts? I've spoken with the home provider and with our tech guys at work and each one blames the other.
Quote from: James Bennett on November 27, 2011, 04:18:55 PMI have not understood the lack of love for #16 at St Andrew's Beach. James,Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but the bunkering on 16 is among the worst on the course. The left hand bunker particularly, is appalling. Just a very poor shaping job. It would look much better without:
The un-photoshopped view from the tee...
Quote from: Kevin Pallier on November 29, 2011, 06:38:32 AMMarkI could have guessed that the call re: 16th at SAB would have prickled with you Kevin,It would be interesting if one or both of the course's designers could say why the hole turned out the way it has. They have nothing to fear - the developers are long gone, and if was their shapers' fault, it could just be a belated performance review. Surely it is your pick for the least distinguished hole too?
One of them. As you know I'm not a huge fan of 13 and add to it 15 plus 10.