Matt
I agree totally, it does look a wee bit like a modern design masquerading as a traditional links. For instance, the use of lateral water hazards, no difference between a lake and a burn/stream running into the sea, when your in it your in it. Same with the apparent "landing zones".
Plenty of comments on here about lost balls and those making them could well be right but I don't think the width is the problem, it looks plenty wide enough to me, and neither do I think its the rough because you get that on any links but looking at those photos and wonder if most players will make the "landing areas" zones when playing into a good going breeze. The thing about links holes is that for instance on a 500 yard hole you might get home with a drive and wedge one day and the next it might be a drive, a 3 wood, a 3 wood....and then a wedge. How do you plan landing areas for that ? You can't, that's the beauty of playing links golf IMO.
Randy
I hope you were being facetious with that last comment. They've basically obliterated a rare beautiful landscape in building the course.
Niall