Devereux Emmet's Mechanicville CC originally started with a short blind par 4/ long blind par 3 depending on the tees. I assume the par 4 tees were used for 1 and the par 3 for 10 given the location of the clubhouse (if the second set of tees even existed to start). I thought it would make a nice way to "get away" from the clubhouse to climb up and away out into the course.
Today, with a new clubhouse sited elsewhere, this hole plays as 7/16.
Tim, I don't clearly recall but at Yale 3, if you challenge the water right do you get a view of the pin? How about if you play short left to the hill? Yale 10 is one of the best strategic examples of blindness that I've seen (take that FWIW), with the choice to play short off the tee opening up the long, visible shot to the green, while long off the leaves a short blind uphill approach. I don't know that "Carries" is a template hole in the traditional sense, but I can't imagine any course that had the supporting topology wouldn't be proud to have that hole.
Melvyn, I absolutely agree that at an essential level the test that is the blind shot, ESP. The blind tee shot, is a fundamental part of the complete golf challenge.
Sean, I also absolutely agree that blindness as a penalty is a great feature. As noted about Yale 10, the fact that blindness and distance are traded off as strategic options on well placed shots is also very cool.
Are there good examples of holes where the best angle requires accepting a blind shot, or other strategic trade offs for even well played shots?