Dick Wilson's Doral was a terrific golf course.
As to Doral being acquired by Trump, off the top of my head, I can't think of a Trump course that's not maintained well, nor can I think of a Trump course that's not run well.
So, why are those who know so little about Trump's modus operendi, with respect to golf courses, being so negative ?
Would you have prefered it if Doral had continued on its current trajectory ?
Pat,
I know you know Wilson's work well.
My Doral experience only dates back to 1983 when I first visited.
I've always thought of the course as a good one,save for the Floyd miscue that was quietly buried.
Do you really think that a simple resoration (with modern length) would pack enough wow factor for there to be any appreciable uptick in interest by the customer base of Doral (past or present)?
Wilson was a fine architect of his era,but I just don't think there's the wow factor there.
It may not matter what we think as something entirely different may be done to the course.
Brad's article has them moving 6 greens so it's somewhat hard for me to see that as restoration.
I will say there was room to do exactly such a thing on the old White on that mature,parklike piece of property and they could've had two excellent courses, rather than the abominaton that is currently the White (nobody played it after the Norman redo,but perhaps that has changed with some softening)
The labor in Maimi can be a problem-it certainly was in my 10 years at Doral.
I do think someone who has demonstrated operating success with golf courses such as Trump has the best chance of breathing life into the resort.
Miami and Trump are probably a good fit-neither are particularly subtle-the Hanse connection intrigues me,but then it is tough out there.....