This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.
Posted today from the Sitwell Park Twitter account; “ How would this be received. Putting the 12th back to how it was originally designed.” Exciting if they genuinely are considering it.
With much thanks to my brother Andy, who some of you may remember joined us at the Painswick BUDA, here are, for what may be the first time, before and after pics of Mackenzie's iconic 12th and 18th greens at Sitwell Park. I've added Andy's emailed comments to me, which clear up once and for all which green is which and that there are inded two separate greens. The two old b/w photos are clearly of two different greens. I showed them to the two senior greenkeepers, and both agreed that the 'very wild' green is now the 12th, and the slightly less wild green is the 18th.THE 18THI think photo 18th01_small is taken pretty close to where the 'HOME GREEN AT SITWELL PARK' photographer was standing. 18th02_small gives you a slightly more close-up view of the now-flat green.Mackenzie's Original 18th green2011: Taken from approximately the same position.A slightly closer view.THE 12TH I've given you three views of the 12th. The key challenge was: where was the photographer standing when he took the iconic view of Mackenzie's 12th green? For the iconic photo seems to have been taken from an impossible place. The ground slopes very sharply up a hill towards the green (you can see this best in 12th03_small), and there's seemingly no way to take the 'iconic' photo without the aid of a cherry picker! Rob I'll leave you to decide. You can see sheds and fences etc behind and to the right of the green, but they are now obscured by bushes and trees.One of the most famous pictures in golf architectural historyApproximately the same view todayThe view from the forward tee.From the front left of the old green.It seems to me that, for the most part, Mackenzie's original contouring is still there, but has just been grown in. The winter green is a new addition, the terrace of the current green has been extended and the bunkering is long gone. It would not be beyond the bounds of possibility to recreate that photo in the current day, if it could just be worked out exactly where the original shot was taken.If Andy's photos do anything they show very clearly just how steep the greensite was and how it was the case that Mackenzie emphasised form over function with his design in this instance. Another thing that strikes me is how dry the grass faces must have been. It had to have been extremely difficult to keep those slopes in a playable condition.Well, I hope this thread ties up a loose end about what became of these greens. Who'd like to join me in recreating the photo?