Looking at Roger's figures, I get a total cost of £71,000 per year for carts with no allowance for staff, maintenance of the path, damage to the course, storage building, pension, insurance etc.
£71,000 divided by 10,000 cart rounds = $7 a round, again without including serious extras which likely pushes that price up. Roger budgets $25 a member per month which comes out to $150,000 per year for the club. But he says the carts only cost $71,000 a year to operate. Why is the membership being charged an extra $79,000 a year ($158 per member) in the name of carts? One could just as easily charge the members $12 a month and say the cart system does not subsidize the walkers. Hell, going on Roger's figures, why not just charge the members who use carts $7 a round (Rogers claim of the true cost per round) for the service rather than adding $25 a month per member? Anybody can claim carts as a revenue source if the members are charged twice what they cost. To me, this is just shuffling figures in budget columns then claiming riders subsidize walkers - it isn't accurate. Sure, then dues need to go up by presumably by amount lost in carts, but at least one gets a true reflection of what things cost so when it comes time to cut the budget there are real figures to work with. All that said, I am a firm believer that clubs have a core operation(s) and the add-ons are services. If the members want the services they figure out how to pay for them. Some clubs like the all-in approach and some prefer the extra services be charged on a user basis. Roger obviously knows his membership and believes they don't care if they are over-charged for carts because the breakdown per month isn't much anyway. As a member of a club, I would much rather know the true operational figures.
Ciao