News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Matt_Ward

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #25 on: February 17, 2011, 01:35:03 PM »
Gary:

Great report.

What tee boxes did you play the 8th hole from ?

Did you venture to the champ tees at #2 -- at least for a look if not actual play.

You mention the wind speed when you played - what direction was the wind blowing from ? When you stood on the 1st tee which direction was the wind blowing?

I love Wolf Creek but the 18th there is almost as much a letdown concluding hole as the 18th at CP.

Tony Weiler

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #26 on: February 17, 2011, 02:51:02 PM »
Does Las Vegas have a last minute tee time website, where you can get discounted rates the day before?

I am going with a group of 6-8 in April that could care less about GCA. Need someplace where we can take cabs/shuttle and not overly expensive. Foe example Bali Hai would be fine course wise if it wasn't so expensive...

Sean, try golfnow.com, and lasvegasgolf.com

Sam Morrow

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #27 on: February 17, 2011, 11:55:36 PM »
Does last minute tickets have any golf deals? I think that's the name of the places where you can get tickets the day of shows for great rates. People line up early in the morning for it to open, I remember one in front of Bills, another in front of Casino Royale, and another one down south side of the strip, might have been down in that asian center between MGM and Planet Hollywood.

Charlie Visconsi

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #28 on: March 17, 2011, 08:57:53 PM »
No one has mentioned Cascata.  It is a very good track at $300 versus $500 at Shadow Creek.  Cascata is not walk-able whereas Shadow Creek can easily be walked.  Also, all 3 Paiute courses are nice (Wolf is best).  They have a pretty good deal to play all 54 holes for around $200.

I would play Cascata, Shadow Creek if you have the money and Paiute courses.  Wolf Creek is 90 mins from the strip and just a bunch of eye candy golf holes.  I was massively hungover when I played there but I could not figure out yardages -- very difficult with all the elevation changes and no idea where to aim on all the forced carries. 


Brad Isaacs

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #29 on: March 18, 2011, 12:38:39 AM »
Las Vegas GOlf Ranking

1) Shadow Creek (not by as much as you might think)
2) Southern Highlands
3) Rflection Bay (oops it is closed)
4) Pauite (Wolf) two sister courses are fun to play as well)
5) TPC Summerlin
6) South Shore @ Lake Las Vegas
7) PRim Valley (Lakes) Desert is worth it as well
8) Cascata
9) Boulder Creek
10)  Coyote Springs (middle of no where)
11) Dragonridge
12) Bear's Best
13) Rio Secco
14) LV Country Club (recently redesigned)
15) Wolf Creek (at Mesquite (goofy course))
16) Badlands
Haven't played Wynn's course at LaRev adnd won't unless gratis.  Not worth playing for a course doomed for destruction if economy ever recovers

Mark Saltzman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #30 on: March 18, 2011, 01:55:38 AM »
For value + quality, hard to beat Coyote Springs.  It's a bit of a drive though (70 MPH speed limits make it not so bad though).  I also really enjoyed Cascata and as Charlie mentioned, compared to the $500 green fee at SC, I prefer it.  Enjoy Vegas (as if there's any way not to).

Mark

David_Elvins

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #31 on: March 18, 2011, 01:59:47 AM »
On the off chance that anyone is around, I will be in Vegas and playing probably pauite and wolf creek nect weekend (26/3). Anyone welcome to join. 
Ask not what GolfClubAtlas can do for you; ask what you can do for GolfClubAtlas.

Jon Spaulding

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #32 on: March 18, 2011, 09:55:30 AM »
David, I will be up there all next week for ConExpo (the man show).

Send me an email if your travels bring you there prior to the weekend, perhaps we can get a drink before I leave town.

Kyle Henderson mentioned that you are a proper access whore, I have 1 spot at Shadow Creek on Thursday. All I need is a purchase order for 6 figures, US.
You'd make a fine little helper. What's your name?

Jeffrey Conners

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #33 on: March 18, 2011, 11:14:07 AM »
I second the recommendation of Coyote Springs.  I played there twice last week.  Greens are a little severe buthe course is a lot of fun.  Pace of play is also better than other Vegas venues.  On Sunday my son and I played were paired with a twosome at 12:30 PM and played in four hours - fast by Las Vegas standards.  We played in three hours as a twosome (with some waiting) on a Wednesday.  If you go, bring food with you.

Gary Slatter

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #34 on: March 18, 2011, 12:36:40 PM »
Gary:

Great report.

What tee boxes did you play the 8th hole from ?

Did you venture to the champ tees at #2 -- at least for a look if not actual play.

You mention the wind speed when you played - what direction was the wind blowing from ? When you stood on the 1st tee which direction was the wind blowing?

I love Wolf Creek but the 18th there is almost as much a letdown concluding hole as the 18th at CP.

Matt
no wind on the first 6 holes, then it was straight from the south.  The 10th was downwind, the 19th and 18th straight into the wind.
Gary Slatter
gary.slatter@raffles.com

Gary Slatter

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #35 on: March 18, 2011, 12:42:47 PM »
Matt, we moved up to the second tees from the back from 8 forward.  you mention 18 is a weak hole, the day we played you could barely reach the fairway from the tee.  Imagine if the surrounds at Wolf Creek were green fescue, it would look like Cashen.
Gary Slatter
gary.slatter@raffles.com

Mark Johnson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #36 on: March 18, 2011, 02:13:50 PM »
not sure why everyone is so against Wynn Golf Club.  Fully agreed that its overprice, but so is every course in the city.

Not saying it in the greatest course in the city, but definitely top 4 or 5.

Gary Slatter

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #37 on: March 18, 2011, 02:46:18 PM »
We also played Badlands and Rhoades Ranch.  Both were ingood shape, and played in less than 4 hours during prime time.  They were excellent value, and less wind than Mesquite.
Badlands was F&F, both had good greens.  Rhodes Ranch has excellent par three holes, and good draught beer (included).
Gary Slatter
gary.slatter@raffles.com

Craig Van Egmond

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #38 on: March 18, 2011, 02:57:50 PM »
not sure why everyone is so against Wynn Golf Club.  Fully agreed that its overprice, but so is every course in the city.

Not saying it in the greatest course in the city, but definitely top 4 or 5.

That's kinda like being the thinnest kid at fat camp.  :)

Matt_Ward

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #39 on: March 19, 2011, 02:59:39 AM »
Mark:

Top four or five ???

Can you explain that statement in somewhat greater detail ?

Brad:

Can you further outline the "goofy" comment on Wolf Creek ?

Gary:

The 18th at WC is really weak -- the waterfall touch just makes it so out of place. If you could barely reach the fairway on #18 when you played -- I have to wonder if you really hit the tee balls that well. The carry is very short.

Shannon Wheeler

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #40 on: March 19, 2011, 10:00:39 PM »
EagleCrest Morgan Stephenson?

Jim Nelson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #41 on: March 21, 2011, 11:18:08 AM »
I think the course mentioned in the beginning of the thread was the Tropicana course.  There definitely was a course on the Northeast quadrant of Trop and the Strip, east of the old Marina casino.  The Dunes course was west of the old Dunes hotel and filled the area between the hotels and I-15.  Wynn took spot of Desert Inn and the Sahara course was renamed Las Vegas National.  Haven't played there in years but it did host the tour event back in the 60's, maybe 70's as well. 

Another public course not mentioned is TPC Las Vegas or Vegas.  Not sure which.  Haven't played it in years, but probably worth a look.  Another is Silverstone, but I have never played it.  Regarding Wolf Creek, the course is definitely polarizing.  I really dislike the cart path management.  Seems like all I see are cart paths running all over.  The first hole is a par five and the cart path cuts through the fairway, a pet peeve of mine.  I would like to see that issue discussed (cart paths running through fairways where they are in play). 
I arise in the morning torn between a desire to improve the world and a desire to enjoy the world.  This makes it hard to plan the day.  E. B. White

Matt_Ward

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #42 on: March 21, 2011, 11:59:59 AM »
Jim:

The cart path issue at Wolf Creek will do what you said -- be polarizing. But many on this site have an aversion to anything other than "traditional" classic period architecture. Sad to say -- but a few of these types would hold their noses in the air for anything other than a 1920"s type course or if a Doak or C&C were to design it. That's fine for those limited adventure types.

In regards to the 1st hole -- the cart path you mentioned really doesn't come into play. Yes, it does cross but if one plays the hole correctly it's not an issue.

For what I was told the 1st at WC was started down the left side to avoid pushing players too close to the line at #9 which comes up the other way. In general terms I have seen cart paths cross fairways and really unless someone is "classic course sensitive" -- I don't see the problem so long as the preponderance of shots doesn't really have anything to do with it.

Jim Nelson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #43 on: March 21, 2011, 12:40:42 PM »
Hi Matt:

IMO, when a cart path crosses a fairway (exception is directly in front of the tee box), it comes into play for someone.  I agree that, at Wolf Creek, my second shot came nowhere near the cart path.  Sadly, it came nowhere near the fairway either.  But my guess is that someone probably hits the cart path on their second shot on a fairly regular basis given the variety of golf shots possible.  I believe this is different than slicing or hooking the ball well away from the direction of play and hitting the path.  Impossible to avoid that.

I have played other courses which also have this design aspect including Black Mesa. Paa Ko Ridge, Promontory (JN course), Primm (Lakes), Timilick are a few that come to mind.  I am particularly annoyed when they are not visible from the fairway, hidden behind a rise in the terrain.  I play at Southern Highlands which has cart paths but they are generally shielded from view and never run through the fairways.  This design seems highly preferred when possible.  I guess the overall point would be "did the architect have no other options"?

Jim   
I arise in the morning torn between a desire to improve the world and a desire to enjoy the world.  This makes it hard to plan the day.  E. B. White

Matt_Ward

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #44 on: March 21, 2011, 12:56:54 PM »
Jim:

Keep in mind this -- when cart paths are involved -- there is ALWAYS the chance that someone will hit them. I don't see the 1st at WC being an issue but my mindset is quite elastic in such situations. For others, the aesthetic will be a deal breaker. Likely these same folks should avoid WC entirely and play something more traditional to their liking.

I explained that in having the 1st and 9th holes at WC -- running the cart path down the entire right side would have been next to impossible and simply have the players exposed to incoming balls for the 9th.

Jim, the people who don't like WC are generally those who prefer traditional classic school design. I've said many times that WC is sort of like hot and spicy Thai food -- some people can't stomach that and should stick with the more appealing for them steak and potato offerings.

Jim Nelson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #45 on: March 21, 2011, 01:19:57 PM »
Matt:

Yes, good point regarding the adjacent hole.  I can't quite remember it, but that is something designers have to take into account which golfers often overlook.  Also, hard to hide cart paths in that extremely hilly environment.
I arise in the morning torn between a desire to improve the world and a desire to enjoy the world.  This makes it hard to plan the day.  E. B. White

Mark Saltzman

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #46 on: March 21, 2011, 01:49:16 PM »
I really didn't mind the cart path crossing down the middle on 1.  As I recall, there are no hazards immediately after the cart path and thus a shot that hits the path will generally just carom a little further down the fairway.  Normally, I'm not a 'cement-hater' like some on this site, but I have to say that given the overall surroundings, the last thing I was focused on was a cart path that crosses the fairway at a point very few players are going to be laying up to.

How about some thoughts on no. 9?  240 yards carry to reach the fairway (and into the wind the day I played).  OK, I understand that if you are playing the tips at WC, you should be a pretty accomplished player, but still, 240?  I really don't see the need for this back tee.  I think 9 would be a very interesting hole from 300 yds.  There is a multi-level green with sharp back-to-front tilt (I think, is that right?), any ball finding bunker 50yds short-right of green is about dead, and forward tee can bring hazard left of green into play for players attempting to drive the green.

I am one of the polarized group that really enjoyed WC, but 9 stood as one of the only negatives from the round (and not being able to find the black tee on 1).  The only other hole that wasn't all that exciting was 15, but I'll just leave my criticism to 9.

Mark

Matt_Ward

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #47 on: March 21, 2011, 04:12:56 PM »
Mark:

The tips at WC are only for the accomplished types. #9 clearly puts it to the player with the carry and prevailing wind.

If one plays the 9th from the next tee box the rigors lessen accordingly.

In regards to #1 -- the staff frowns on people playing from that position -- so you end up on the more forward tee -- I also think it's a good hole from that yardage because going for the green in two becomes possible provided two shots are hit with both length and accuracy married together.

Morgan Stephenson

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #48 on: March 21, 2011, 10:24:15 PM »
This is the Morgan Stephenson from Eagle Crest, Shannon.

In regards to WC, I really liked the golf course and the scenery. Probablly the most dangerous cart paths I have ever been on! Wind was definately a factor the day I played. I thought that most of the holes were fun and at least interesting and different. I would like to play it again as I would make some different club selections off of the tee. I thought it was amazing that they built a course on that site. 

Matt_Ward

Re: Las Vegas golf
« Reply #49 on: March 22, 2011, 03:41:17 PM »
The difficulty of WC has plenty to do with the terrain -- no doubt cart usage being mandated will turn off plenty of people. The other aspect that makes the course tough is twofold -- the decisions you need to reach at the tee box -- plenty of risk / reward type holes and if you don't know exactly your carry points it can be quite vexing.

The other dimension is the wind -- it can be VERY windy at times. When the southerly winds pick up in intensity -- the 8th, to name just one hole, can be a real beast -- from the tips at just under 250 yards it is in my mind -- the most difficult long par-3 one can play in the States. Best bet for most people -- in heavy wind play the hole from the 150 yard marks.