Tom the Mac,
You absolutely called me a liar and admit so once again. "I said you were bluffing when you implied you had internal club documents/minutes that made your case."
First of all I didn't IMPLY a single thing. I flat out stated numerous times that I had complete, total and unfettered access to ALL the internal documents and made copies of everything relating to this and many other issues. Your use of the word "bluffing" has been taken by far too many people on this and the other thread that you called me a LIAR. Those exact words have been told to you over and over. As for your "apology" it is worthless on its face. You need to man up and admit what you did for it to have any true meaning.
That you have the audacity to ask "Have you presented any internal club documents?" after I have stated over and over again that I will NOT do so smacks of one who clearly is still making the same "accusation" which is the term you yourself used. All of this Tom because you refused to accept that Worthington wouldn't have hired an "untetsted and inexperienced" person to design and build Shawnee in 1910.
While we're on the issue of credibility, earlier in this thread you stated that you had "no idea" who designed Shawnee. Really? Then why did you post on the other thread "Phil-the-author, Are you disputing the fact that CC Worthington had a wealth of experience? If you don't think Worthington was actively involved in the design of Shawnee I've got a used car I'd like to sell you, it was owned by a little old lady who only drove it to church on Sundays."
Also on credibility, after I had asked you a question nearly half a dozen times on the other thread you stated, ""Phil-the-author, I'm sorry...I rarely read your posts....what is your question?"
Do you remember how I responded? I ended it with a question you still haven't answered and if you desire ANY credibility you must own up to this as well:
Tom the Mac,
I thought about it for a minute, and whether you answer my question or not is of no significance because there really is no way you can defend your statement in light of what Tilly was doing at Shawnee.
What I feel I must comment on is your insulting and sarcastic statement, "Phil-the-author, I'm sorry...I rarely read your posts....what is your question?"
NONSENSE!
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU answer my question in post #31 as you did in #35?
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU answer my question in post #37 as you did in #38?
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU answer my answer in post #44 as you did in #45?
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU answer my answer in post #46 as you did in #47?
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU answer my new comment in post #50 as you did in #52?
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU answer my comment which ONCE AGAIN contained the question you were ignoring in post #56 as you did in #57 while ignoring the question once again?
If that was true, on this thread why would YOU respond to my reply to your #57 with an answer in #60, where I AGAIN asked the question, with a response in #62 where you once again ignored the question?
I responded in #67 and once AGAIN asked the question to which you SARCASTICALLY responded in #68 with "Thanks."
Who do you think you are kidding with "Phil-the-author, I'm sorry...I rarely read your posts....what is your question?"
You want answers to questions you ask me? Answer those...