Tom Doak,
My memory is a little fuzzy, but, I think that there was universal agreement that the dual mounds would not be within the putting surface. Hence there was noone advocating for a 1920 restoration, rather a 1936 restoration with modification on the location of the mounds.
And, as I recall, you presented a rather good rendering for restoring the hole to that configuration.
Recently, on two seperate days, I had 3 guests and 7 guests, and without prompting, 9 of them suggested that the hole seemed out of context with the rest of the golf course.
Now these are golfers ranging in handicap from 19 to 1, so it's a nice cross section of golfers who noticed the disconnect.
Maybe next year.