'Sir Dionysus,
I think you need help with your reading comprehension."
JC:
Do You?
Perhaps what you should do first is review your entire Post #25.
"Mr. Doak is wrong in his comment that Weiskopf builds the flattest greens of any architect working today."
Is that right? Do you think you know more about Weiskopf greens than Doak does, and if so what is the evidence of it? Show me; show the evidence of that; show any of us; show the damn "courtroom" counselor?
"I then gave a potential rationale for why, TO THE EXTENT that he builds flat greens, he may do so."
Did You? You gave A POTENTIAL 
rationale (for why, TO THE EXTENT that he builds flat greens, he may do so)?
Look, JC, don't try to play petty legal classroom or courtroom games on here with us on the subject of golf course architecture because it's bound not to work at least and it's transparent at most, or perhaps vaguely one and the same.
So, don't do it, unless or of course you are trying to imitate or mimic the MO of an architectural/intellectual reprobate and perhaps semi-failed lawyer such as David Moriarty on here! 
Mr. Bacchus, Sir:
Your post is a feeble attempt to obfuscate.
At least you finally recognized that two, independent, statements were made in my post #25. Perhaps I should I always hold your hand and walk you through posts like I do my 6 year old daughter with chapter books.
Now, to the extent you addressed my post, which is barely if at all, let me address yours.
1) Does Doak know more about Weiskopf greens than I do? If so, let him show the evidence. Do you see how ridiculous that argument is? Sir Doak makes a generalized statement and you lap it up as gospel as if you were sitting at the feet of a prophet. His statement is completely unprovable and that's why HE is wrong. How many Weiskopf greens has he played? How many Weiskopf courses has he seen? Has he seen every modern course built in the last 20 years so as to make a legitimate comparison? How could he POSSIBLY know that Weiskopf builds the flattest greens of any architect today? For God sakes man, use your brain and stop displaying your obvious butt-boy-ness.
Lets say that Mr. Weiskopf himself said that he builds the flattest greens of any architect today. How the hell could HE prove that statement. He can't. It would be marketing at its best. Do you see the problems here?
2) You must spend your days in the barn watching cable "news" programming; taking notes on how NOT to make a coherent argument. My point regarding the statement he made (that being the statement regarding certain death if greens like St. Andrews were built in the US) was, and is, entirely separate from my point regarding Saint Doak of Architecture being wrong. It was, and is, entirely speculative and acknowledged by me as such when I said PERHAPS. I have no idea why Mr. Weiskopf builds the greens he does but what he said (FROM HIS MOUTH AND BROADCAST TO MILLIONS) is at least somewhat of an indication on his architecture philosophy.
So, until you can put together the answers to my questions or put forth a quote from Weiskopf regarding green building philosophy, I suggest go to the book store and pick up a dictionary and a 4th grade workbook on reading comprehension. Either that or READ the posts before you respond.