"Can someone explain to me why James is condemned to play in Cleveland just because he's from Ohio?"
Jeff -- I grew up not far from where LeBron grew up, and therefore have watched his career intently since he was a boyhood star at Akron St. Vincent St. Mary's. I'm not sure he should be condemned to play in Cleveland. Unlike what the Lakers did with Kobe (bring in Shaq in his prime, maneuver to get Gasol in his prime, get tested veterans like Artest), and what the Bulls did with Jordan (mainly get Pippen, one of the 25 best players ever in the NBA, but also several other solid role players), the Cavs have surrounded James with cast-offs, second-tier role players, and guys who in crunch time simply can't deliver what's needed to win an NBA championship. James' Cavs teammates aren't bad players, but they aren't championship-caliber ones, either. I'm unhappy James has left his roots for a better team, but I think the comparisons going on right now between him and Kobe and Jordan, who stuck with the teams that drafted them, are off -- apples and oranges (same holds true with Joe Mauer -- the only athlete on the planet in a remotely similar situation as James, i.e, a superstar playing for the team where he grew up. The Twins surround Mauer with players capable of winning championships). Jerry Seinfeld once famously joked that sports fans truly rooted to their hometown teams are basically cheering for laundary, given the paucity of players who stay where they began their careers. It's too bad, but I'm not surprised.