I'll skip any other critique of Spyglass, which I played for the first time last week, except to say that I found it to be overrated (could have been the recently aerified fairways, but even the best wooded holes reminded me of courses I've played in Minnesota.)
But what's the deal with the green on #4? The model for the contouring seemed to be one of those three-level slides your kids ride on gunny sacks at the State Fair. Because of recent rains, the pro shop told us all the hole locations would be "high and dry" -- which meant that on #4, the hole was on the first third of the green. I can't imagine that tier ever being used during the AT&T; none of us could get a ball to stop near the hole, and the green speeds must have been slower than they are during a tournament. One guy in our group hit a reasonably good chip shot from just in front of the green and watched it roll off the first tier (which is about ten feet wide), gather speed as it rolled off the second tier and finally come to rest at the far edge of the third tier, leaving him a 60 or 70-footer back up the two tiers to a hole location at which the ball was unlikely to stop anyway.
From the fairway all you see is iceplant left and the little tongue of the first tier. The rest of the green is below your line of vision, and the wider lowest tier is surround by mounds. It's a lousy target and a terrible green, in my estimation. I thought it was out of character with every other green on the course, and with any other Robert Trent Jones green I'd ever played. Does anyone have any insight into the creation/evolution of this green, or a reasonable defense for it?