Jordan:
I agree with some of your post, and not with other parts.
All of the top-100 lists tend to obscure the fact that places like Pacific Grove are terrific courses and great fun. I have some great memories from playing there.
I've only ever played Pacific Grove solo, so my experience wasn't about the company I was with, it was about the course. For that matter, the company I've kept over the years at Cypress Point was pretty good, too. So I think you are setting up a false comparison that you don't need to set up.
You need to stick to the original point, that loving good golf courses has nothing to do with counting up how many top-100 courses one has played. Nothing makes me madder than hearing about guys who are determined to play all of the top 100 traveling 5,000 miles to cross two courses off their list, and not even bothering to go to the cool course next door to see what it's like, because it's not on the list. After all, they only have so much time to get publicity for themselves by completing their goal!
We don't need more people to play all of the top 100. We already KNOW about all of those courses. We cherish people who go see the less likely candidates and help determine whether those should undermine the top 100 ... and make all the goofballs fly halfway around the world to see the course they skipped last time.
And they'll still miss Pacific Grove, or Askernish, or Pennard, or Belvedere, or hundreds of other courses they would have enjoyed immensely, if they could get their eyes off the prize.
P.S. If you think it's more fun to just stay at home and play with your friends, then why are you making so many trips to see famous courses?