ohhh my lord....so much more inviting off the tee. Congrats on such a great removal
Southampton was always inviting off the tee.
Not sure fecsue/bluestem (replacing trees with light rough underneath) will make it more inviting.(certainly not if you are hunting balls-or behind a group doing so)
I applaud the restoration of the old bunker style and placement(or at least interpretive placement)
Fortunately the greens were virtually unchanged over the years.
While no doubt like most every Golden Age course, Southampton had a glut of planted trees that needed thinning/removal,......Not sure that a course completely surrounded by trees should suddenly lose ALL trees on the interior with 4-5 parallel/adjacent holes on the back nine. There were some beautiful mature hardwoods on the back nine. Recent thinning had turned doglegs into straight holes for longer hitters.
That said the thinning of the trees up to this point has been an attractive feature allowing looks across the course not seen in years,
Curious what Raynor's original thoughts were when he designed the course on future growth/planting of selective trees.
We here on GCA tend to get all fired up about restorations, but I don't think anyone's looking for a return to greens that stimp at 5-6 as they did in 1925.
I'm sure there's some room in golf for a few mature trees on hundred year old courses that are surrounded by mature trees.
Looking forward to the finished product and certainly will reserve judgement until then.
Either way it will continue to be a great club/course.