but I also think that more subdued colors - like in the picture of the Irish gentleman - can produce great images. So I don't think saturated is necessarily better or worseUlrich......... agreed. When I go to photograph a course, I don't start out with the goal of shooting a "saturated" image. The overall look of your image depends on the quality of the light, the subject matter you have at hand, and how you use your film/filter combination. In post, you can make your images neon if you wish irrespective of whether you shoot film or digital.
If I go out on a Friday night and I am in a mellow mood I might have a nice round soft Cabernet. Then again if I am in a somewhat sporty mood, I could order a red bull and vodka (NOT) but you get the picture.
You might classify this first image as "subdued".....
And this one as "saturated".......
And both of them might appeal to different people at different times. If I was asked to describe the look of my images, I would probably say: "Bright, clean, simple, and graphic". Maybe that is my style and that is for others to decide.
The most important question I ask myself when I step on the first tee box is, who is paying the bill? Then my job is to make sure they are happy with the final images. My job is to make the client look good. In all my years shooting golf courses, no one has ever said: "your images are too saturated or they are too subdued". If the image is strong enough, saturated or subdued should not be an issue.