David and Mike,
I think that both of you are misunderstanding the use of the term "scratch" as it is used to describe the early golfers in America. I believe that both of you are imparting a great deal of what the term means today, especially in relevance to par. In the early years, the best player at a club was considered the "scratch" player, the one to be measured up against. Just as we view "par" as near sacred today, back then "bogey" was similarly used as a measurement of talent. Quite often the "scratch" player at a club was at or just above "bogey" as a score on average.
Will that change either of your stances on Leeds? No, and it shouldn't, but it might make the understanding of how the players were described become easier to accept.
Tom Macwood, would you say that any of the swing coaches that Tiger Woods has employed taught him to play? Of course, that is an extreme. How about this. Would you say that Tom Strafaci taught me how to play? I took a few lessons from him at Bethpage in the 1970s and he is the only professional I ever took one from. Or would you say that I learned the game from my father who first put a club in my hands when I was 5 and my oldest brother who took me to driving ranges when I was 11-16 or even the professionals I watched on TV and whose swings I tried to emulate?
My point is that I was actually pretty much self-taught, yet by the definitions that you are applying to Campbell and Leeks it must have been Strafaci who taught me when all he actually did was make a vain attempt to refine my swing.
Since Leeks obviously was playing the game at least a year before he met Campbell, he certainly didn’t learn how to play golf from him. So your conclusion stated to Tom Paul, “I suppose in your mind you see Leeds ignoring the lessons of the poorly educated vagabond, he could learn the game on his own, but I don't that is a reasonable conclusion…” is in incorrect on its face. The facts show that he had already both learned how to play golf and was doing so at a fairly decent LOCAL level.
Now, do I think that Leeds benefited from suggestions or actual lessons from Campbell? Yes I do. Just as today when even a talented amateurs seek out advice from the very best of players, it is THAT which can be “reasonably concluded” from the reports of Campbell’s giving lessons where Leeds was playing. Teaching him the game though is simply not correct.
Did Campbell influence Leeds architecturally? In my opinion the jury is still out on that one and his aiding him to become a better player (if he did) has no bearing on that discussion.
Finally, you have taken others to task and refused to accept as either facts or corroboration articles or writings that are not “contemporaneous.” To quote from Bob Labbance as a corroboration of your opinions flies in the face of your prior comments and I believe that Bob would have gotten quite a chuckle out of it….