You guys think if a hole was designed like this today we would think it is goofy?
Well, depends on who you're talking to. I think most of us on this site would think it retro-cool, a nice combination of features that make the hole the rare fusion of fun to look at and fun to play. The general golfing public, I don't know. It's the same question that can be asked about Silva's Black Creek, or Renaissance's Old MacDonald. Both will prove to be successes, and IMHO, Old Mac will be the most fun of the four up there. I am not sure how many players at The Resort will know who C.B. MacDonald was, or even care. They will see features like the back of the 11th green, they will see sod-faced, sleeper faced, and free form bunkers and wonder if Mr. Urbina was schizophrenic without knowing the history of those particular hole types. In the end, it may look weird to those who don't know, to those on this site, we will love it!
I've never seen Black Creek, but I would love to see how the average Chattanoogan reacts the first time they see it. It's not like grass faced, flat bottomed bunkers bordering geometrically shaped greens is common in the Southeast. Silva's interpretation of classical design could be thought jarring by an unwashed, unfamiliar observer. Just as this hole at Creek Club could/would be considered if built today.