Bill S:
Good stuff -- as Eastwood was famous for saying, "A man's got to know his limitations."
Plenty of good info from those who know their own territories. I'll be happy to post my recommended Jersey list -- I have added info on a few other states from other threads posted previously.
Just a quick question -- you have the RTJ course at Bellerive as #3 in the state. Is that rating based upon hosting previous majors - what makes the RTJ layout there unique because frankly from those I know well who have played there they don't see much there. Or is the high rating tied to the fact that Missouri golf overall is not that superior in terms of overall depth.
Forgive my ignorance -- I've only played in the state 3-4 times.
Matt,
I unfortunately St. Louis is lacking in great golf course architecture. St. Louis C. C. is THE great course in St. Louis. When doing my ranking, St. Louis is on my list as Tiger Woods was on the World Rankings list before his knee injury - nothing else even comes close.
The good early courses in St. Louis are dominated by the Foulis brothers. On my list that included Glen Echo, Normandie, Algonquin, and Forest Park. I like their courses very much and think they are very fun courses with some interesting strategic options offered.
One of the problems for St. Louis courses is the environment. The soil has quite a bit of clay and is not conducive to great golf course turf. Also, most St. Louis courses (including St. Louis C.C.) have a lot of trees that come into play. It is common on many of the course to be in the fairway at certain spots and have branches blocking your path to the hole. Having grown up with this type of golf, I enjoy the challenge presented by having to play around the trees, even in the fairways. Only in the last few years have I begun to appreciate the benefit of keeping trees out of play, but I still think they can serve a purpose on some courses.
Other than the Foulis brothers' courses, St. Louis C.C., and Wayne Stiles' 36 holes at Norwood C.C., not much of any significance happened in St. Louis golf architecture until RTJ did Old Warson and then Bellerive in the 1950s. Then again nothing more of any significance happened until the 1980s. So that was half a century with only 2 significant courses added to the region.
I would agree that if you drop Bellerive in New Jersey it may not make a top 25 for the state. Nevertheless, I do think it is an excellent example of a RTJ championship course. It is a brute of a course, mainly about power golf. But it will challenge you and will require your best game to do well there.
It is a big course, with big greens. It lacks the quaintness and variety of St. Louis C.C., but it also does not have any silly holes. Its biggest knock may be that it is somewhat boring, but I think this is a simplification of the course. I actually see some minimalism to the course. I do like courses with blind shots, with some quirks, and I am OK with a course that is not always "fair". Bellerive is a fair course that rewards good shots and punishes bad shots. Personally I could never play most of my golf at Bellerive, but if you want a course that will test your game to the max in St. Louis, in my opinion there is no better choice then Bellerive.
In addition, I do like the most recent renovations. I think the current bunkering and some of the changes to the green have visually improved the course, and added a bit of fun to the course.
Perhaps Bellerive is St. Louis's Butler National. I have never been to Butler, although from what I have read I expect Butler is the harder of the two courses. But Bellerive is St. Louis's brute of a course, and it is a good example of that style of golf course architecture.
Finally, I did not take tournament history into any consideration. But it is interesting to see the list of champions at Bellerive:
1965 US Open - Gary Player
1981 US Mid-Am - Jim Holtgrieve
1992 PGA Championship - Nick Price
2004 US Senior Open - Peter Jacobson
2008 Western Open - Camilo Villegas
I do not think this list says anything conclusive about the course, but it is a good list of winners.
On a side note, Jim Healey is the dean of golf history in St. Louis. He has a couple of contributions on this site, one per Glen Echo and the other per the Foulis brothers. His book GOLFING BEFORE THE ARCH is a must read by all St. Louis golfers. In addition his web site Golfing Before the Arch -
http://stlgolfhistory.com/ - is a great resource for not just St. Louis golf, but for all golf. On his site besides many links and details per St. Louis golf, he also has a section that lists the winners and sites of all of the men’s and women’s major professional and amateur golf tournaments -
http://stlgolfhistory.com/results.html.