Adam:
The tone and the descriptions in almost every single article in these old newspapers is so similar, particularly in the early Philadelphia newspapers, I would be very surprised if there is a single person on this website who still thinks those reporters were interested in doing some really informative and objective architectural reviews as to the differences between good and not so good golf course architecture or beauty or lack of it. It sure sounds to me like those newspapers and their reporters were doing a ton of good old fashioned and fairly blatant marketing of clubs and such!
My great, great (or maybe one more great) grandfather essentially owned one of those Philadelphia newspapers (The Public Ledger) and to him and the guy who ran the paper for him, development (real estate expansion, clubs, business, whatever) was generally good for overall business which they were all interested in and certainly extrapolated into selling more newspapers.
If we want more objective, critical and in-depth analysis of any of these early courses probably a better place to find it is in the early golf magazines and not necessarily the local newspaper reporting.