I think the most extreme example I have seen of this is a par 3 with a 360 degree tee. I don't remember where it is. Perhaps someone can inform Jordan.
Garland,
I think that's Desmond Muirhead, though I forget the course.
In that case, that is perhaps too extreme as certain tee positions most certainly interrupt the flow of the routing. Imagine walking 180 degrees around a hole , going back to the green, then going back to the next tee close to where you started. That would be a lot of un-needed extra walking, which would definitely interrupt the flow. There's a reason Desmond Muirhead was the one to do that.
Using the third at Chambers, which you have seen and played, you can see how using varied tee placements can work without interrupting the routing.
Jordan,
I've played the Legacy, and at ground level I can state pretty affimratively that it doesn't make much of a difference where the markers are set.
They also look pretty dumb from the ground, but since it's Vegas, they should get a pass because it's clearly not about low-key grace and subtlety.
Mike,
I have not played it, just seen those photos, and I do admit the tee boxes are quite quizzical to say the least. Only in Vegas, right!?
But, it would still appear that a tee position on the right side of the clover would make right hole locations interesting. I'm not saying make tee boxes in the shape of card suits, just using even the worst of examples to show how a hole could be made interesting based off angles of tee locations.
Cheers,
Jordan