News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Ian Andrew

The Evolution and Expropriation of Highlands Links
« on: November 27, 2008, 08:43:40 PM »
I know many on here have an interest in Highlands Links and I'll continue to share things as I find them.

The Evolution of Highlands Links

Stanley Thompson conceived the idea of getting Parks Canada to build new golf courses as a make work project for the people of the area during the depression era. He saw the government as one of the last sources of available money to build a golf course. He sold it to the government as a way to take the hardest hit communities and put those people back to work. The end result would be a new source of permanent income and employment for the community.

Stanley Thompson convinced Parks Canada to build, not one, but two great courses in the boundaries of their Park. Since it was a make work project, the construction at Highlands Links was largely done by hand and was limited to one steam shovel and one truck to make sure it employed the maximum number of people.

While the course was supposed to be completely inside the Park, Stanley selected areas outside the Park for inclusion in the golf course. Many people were forced to surrender ancestral homes in order to supply Stanley Thompson with the land to build a golf course. Most ended up on the construction team, since it took a very long time for them to get reimbursed for the land that was expropriated and these people needed income to survive.

While we think of this great course as Stanley Thompson’s Mountains and Ocean course, it also represents one of the more practical routing he ever conceived. Most of the holes of the golf course are routed where Thompson was able to find soil. While we still cringe at the thought of Thompson taking people’s land for his course, he must have clearly seen that if he did not use their farm land, there was not going to be enough money to complete the project.

Since most of the site was not treed, Thompson was able to recognize the opportunities he had for natural holes. He routed his holes in over and around the great flowing contours to deliver a series of stunning golf holes. He also was careful to avoid as much bulldozer work as possible to keep the costs down to a minimum. Stanley Thompson came out each month to inspect the progress. He changed anything that he did not like and often would gather the men to change greens or bunkers to create the design he was looking for.

His lead foreman was originally Hennie Henderson, an Engineer, who was given the task of clearing the site and organizing the distribution of soil around the property. This was eventually taken over by Geoffrey Cornish. Cornish supervised the removal of 12,000 cubic yards of topsoil from the 6th fairway and at least another 700 cubic yards of topsoil brought down from further up the Clyburn Valley to be distributed over the site. The soil was used for the greens, the tees and to cover the rocky part and some of the hills on the fairways. The rest was done by hand.

The course was seeded to fescue and New Zealand Bent, but the fescues quickly died out giving way to poa annua that is predominant today. Thompson also sent Ken Gullan to give the course “a definitive links look” He transplanted Marram grass from near by to some of the “seascape holes.” That work was mostly confined to the 6th and 4th holes.

The course came in slightly over budget and was built for around $180,000. The budget including the bridges was around $167,000 including overruns.

The Major Changes till 1982

In 1967 Cecil MacNeil constructed the blue tee on the 11th hole that changed the hole to a par 5. The 13th hole was previously changed from a par 5 to a par 4 so the course remained a par 72.

In 1974 Cecil MacNeil and his crew excavated the pond on the 12th hole. The area had been wet previously and this formalized the pond.

The big change in 1974 was the rebuilding of the 13th green. It was done to elevate the level of the green in an attempt to prevent flooding. The original green was approximately two to three feet lower than it is today and was bowl shaped. It featured a swale that ran diagonally from front right to back left of the green.

In 1979 the Park Superintendent at the time asked Cecil MacNeil to close 27 bunkers in order to make the operation more efficient.

In 1980 the large bunker behind number 8 was closed.

In 1982 Stewart Best created the pond on the 6th hole to take care of drainage problems found on the 6th fairway.



I'll be curious to get people's reaction to the expropriation that took place.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2008, 03:47:46 PM by Ian Andrew »

Tom Naccarato

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2008, 10:17:26 PM »
Ian,
Are you going to be trying to reclaim some of these features and hazards?

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2008, 10:38:18 PM »
Tommy,

Some changes like the two ponds will have to stay - their now habitat whether created or man made.

The bunkers will be restored back to the original shapes and sizes. There's lost of available photographic evidence and good aerials to make sure its done right. Same with the original playing corridors and views - the park recognizes the need for tree removal and has approved most of the removals already. It's only clearing beyond 50 feet of the corridor that will require further talks.

Everything is beginning to head in the right direction. There was 6-7 weeks of clearing done this fall.

Tyler Kearns

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2008, 12:41:57 PM »
Ian,

Glad to hear that progress is being made at Highlands Links.  The photos you posted earlier of the tree clearing likely represent the most important changes to the course, in terms of both agronomy and playability.

Best of luck with the project.

TK

Greg McMullin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2008, 08:36:09 AM »
Ian, just wondering what your thoughts are regarding the changes to the 11th and 13th? What was lost and what was gained with these changes?

--In 1967 Cecil MacNeil constructed the blue tee on the 11th hole that changed the hole to a par 5. The 13th hole was previously changed from a par 5 to a par 4 so the course remained a par 72.


Jeff_Mingay

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2008, 09:34:53 AM »
The history of Cape Breton Highlands Links is fascinating... especially the expropriation of lands for construction of the golf course. There's a strange dynamic in Ingonish today. So many people there have a connection to the course -- ancestors of those who worked at building Highlands Links, literally by hand, work on the course today. It's amazing. And, some of the same people, so proud of Highlands Links, still hold some hard feelings about the expropriation, more than 70 years later.

As for the course, one of Ian's most interesting finds so far is the shifting of the 11th green. This particular green site became so shaded over the years that the putting surface was actually shifted back, toward the tee, into the fairway approach. The back portion of the green, on a plateau that's quite clear to see, is currently lost. This will be one of the most interesting aspects of the planned restoration of Highlands Links... getting this putting surface back to where it belongs, as per Thompson's original design. 
jeffmingay.com

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2008, 12:40:16 PM »
A few facinating things I've learned so far:

Stanley had the option to route holes in the other direction out to Middle Head but choose not too

He had the option to continue down the coast after the 6th green. Likely out of the question because of the road system of the time.

The 4th tees all played over a stretch of dunes to the fairway

There is 20 feet of green missing from the left of the 10th green

The 11th was so open you could see the Clydburn brook out to the left and the 11th green is 25 feet forward of the original plateau since the back was lost and they never returned the green after losing the back.

The 12th green was 10,000 sq.ft. There is 30 feet missing from the front of the green.

The 13th was a par five!

The 18th green had a view of Smokey Head.

Dan Moore

  • Total Karma: -1
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2008, 12:50:06 PM »
Ian,

Thank you and good luck with the project.  Highland Links has been on my wish list since ontaining my first copy of the World Atlas of Golf 25 years ago.  Hopefully a visit will be made after you complete your work. 
"Is there any other game which produces in the human mind such enviable insanity."  Bernard Darwin

Greg McMullin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #8 on: December 02, 2008, 12:58:35 PM »
Ian, I heard that there was some considerable tree clearing taking place off to the right side of the 18th green (the entrance road side) If this is the case this would open up the views towards Ingonish Beach and, depending on how many trees were/are removed, a view of Smokey Mountain.  :)

Also, if 13 was a par 5 -  I wonder if the tee was further back? On the card now the back tee shows 435 yards and it would seem a par 5 would have been longer.

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2008, 03:50:05 PM »
Greg,

The 12th at Laval-sur-le-lac was a 440 yard par five.
The finishing two holes at St. George's were both par fives at around 470 yards.

I must admit I had trouble believing this one because I haven't found a second corresponding piece to confirm Ken's research.

I remember playing the hole in 1981 and it was a par four then. We played the old 11th hole in its original form. I also distinctly remembered four par fives with both being back to back.

I would like to find an old card to confirm this.

Dan Herrmann

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #10 on: December 02, 2008, 04:06:22 PM »
Ian,
Ran wrote in his writeup:
4th hole, 325 yards, Heich O'Fash; Given the rigors of the 1st and 2nd hole, and given the comforting appearance of the 3rd, the golfer may take one look at the yardage on this hole and relax. What a mistake (!) and Joe Robinson has seen more 8s on this hole from good players than any other hole on the course. Indeed, its name Heich O'Fash means heap of trouble. Such short two shotters are an absolute must for any great course with the absence of such a hole the obvious short coming of the Black Course at Bethpage. Along with other greats such as Cypress Point, Pine Valley and The Old Course at St. Andrews, Highlands Links possesses several excellent holes under 350 yards in length, starting here at the 4th. The original Thompson tee is to the left of the 3rd green but was abandoned due to its proximity to a pull hook from the 3rd tee. From the original tee, the hole played dead straight to the green 295 yards away. The new tee behind the 3rd green adds a left to right bend to the hole and 25 yards in length making the green no longer drivable. Thus, the good golfer is less tempted to be greedy, which is a shame as that's when the fireworks can occur. Regardless, the green complex atop a knob highlights Thompson's genius for routing a course. While an appealing sandy area lies 30-40 yards to the right of the fairway, the most interesting land form is the knob, and thus Thompson followed nature's lead in placing the hole here.

------------------
Any chance the orginal tee would be reclaimed?

And, I've always thought this approach had a look and feel similar to Pine Valley #2.  What do you think?

Jeff_Mingay

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #11 on: December 02, 2008, 04:14:07 PM »
Ian,

For whatever it's worth, I also find it hard to believe that 13 was ever a par-5. It doesn't matter anyway, does it. Call this hole whatever you want... it's a fine hole.
jeffmingay.com

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #12 on: December 02, 2008, 04:45:45 PM »
Dan,

The tees will be back in play. The key trees that block the pull hook have grown back up.

I have played the course now 8 times and have yet to hit a tee ball from anywhere but the 295 yard tee. The middle tee on the far right side happens to  be an original tee. It was at one time abandoned but was retuned in the 1970's.

Jeff,

I'm also skeptical about the information too.

Greg McMullin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #13 on: December 02, 2008, 05:26:59 PM »
Ian, I may be able to connect with someone who would have some old scorecards. I'll see what I can come up with and let you know.

Don Hyslop

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #14 on: December 03, 2008, 07:43:20 AM »
Happened upon this slide show of the holes at Highland Links on YouTube. Apparently taken this summer before the tree removal project began. Illustrates some of the problems near greens.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbShsYquiA8
Thompson golf holes were created to look as if they had always been there and were always meant to be there.

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #15 on: December 03, 2008, 09:27:14 PM »
I'm still finishing up my labour of love.



This is an image of what the 5th hole would look like cleared out...

« Last Edit: December 04, 2008, 02:02:14 PM by Ian Andrew »

Guy Nicholson

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #16 on: December 03, 2008, 10:53:40 PM »
I'm still finishing up my labour of love.

This is an image of what the 5th hole would look like cleared out...



Bring on that left-hand pin position!

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2008, 11:26:18 AM »
Guy,

The green was 12 feet further left and tight to the front left bunker.



Originally you hit across the dunes on the 4th hole - the back and front tee on the right were additions.

« Last Edit: December 04, 2008, 02:02:49 PM by Ian Andrew »

Matt Kardash

  • Total Karma: 1
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2008, 12:14:37 PM »
Looks awesome Ian. I like the long views.
It would be cool if you provided some "before" shots to go along with what you plan on doing to see the extent of the change!
the interviewer asked beck how he felt "being the bob dylan of the 90's" and beck quitely responded "i actually feel more like the bon jovi of the 60's"

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2008, 02:05:14 PM »
Matt,

I have put up the befores to go with the afters.

This is Muckle Mouth Meg....


Greg McMullin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2008, 02:17:41 PM »
Ian, the only word that comes to mind when looking at 6 is WOW!

Mark Bourgeois

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2008, 03:22:06 PM »
Ian

This research must have been pure pleasure. Very well done!

Fascinating the expropriation on behalf of a golf course. It's always the other way around. I should say that under virtually all circumstances to call such a taking morally wrong is beside the point, as no court would agree a golf course served the public. Would they?

Is this one of those cases of "Depression economics," where the normal rules are turned upside down?

What is your source on the taking? Did the government actually declare eminent domain?

Were the courts involved?

Ah, now that I think of it, there is a distant precedent: Robert Moses's methods for building parks and parkways. In the final analysis those still were quite different, though. For one thing, more traditional public works projects were involved, plus Moses acted from a de facto sort of legal authority. (As he would learn, he did not rule de jure, but that's another story.)

Mark Bourgeois

PS I also find the labor reliance interesting. How did that influence the quality of the final effort? For example, did the slower pace of the construction give Thompson time to make changes he wouldn't have seen or contemplated had a faster approach been employed?

Lastly, interesting as well to consider how much lower the construction costs would have been had machinery been employed. Or had wages fallen so far, and in that remote area were so low, that, as with Dye at Casa de Campo, this was a rare occasion where labor was cheaper?

Ian Andrew

Re: The Evolution of Highlands Links from 1936 - 1982
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2008, 03:46:48 PM »
The Robert Moses analogy is a good one.

Near here - the Niagara Falls Country Club at one time had a hole on the Niagara Gorge right where the escarpment ends and the view opens out to Niagara on the Lake. It would have been a stunning setting. Moses ran the Niagara Parkway through the area and expropriated the hole in the process.

I’m sure people who make these decisions believe they are acting for the greater good – but I struggle with Thompson’s decision in this case when he could have picked from other areas in the Park. Remember this land was NOT in the Park at the time and his golf course was supposed to be!

BCrosby

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution and Expropriation of Highlands Links
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2008, 03:58:40 PM »
This is a public course, no?

I have no problem with the taking. The rules were clear, the owners of the private lands were fairly compensated, I assume. The province acquired the lands for reasons that related to the appeal and use of the park, which seems to me a legitimate public purpose.

The problem with "takings" is when they are done where the rules aren't clear and when they are done by someone simply exercising his political clout. Usually for purely private purposes.

Jean de la Blague

 


Greg McMullin

  • Total Karma: 0
Re: The Evolution and Expropriation of Highlands Links
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2008, 03:59:46 PM »
Jean Paul and Ian, for a more complete understanding of the lead up to the construction of Highlands Links have a look at the following link. Pages 23 to 61 give a good overview of what the thinking was. The creation of the park involved about 300 expropriations.

http://books.google.ca/books?id=uSBPQkbbCr0C&dq=Natural+Selections:+National+Parks+in+Atlantic+Canada,+1935-1970&printsec=frontcover&source=bl&ots=_svdr3Z7mq&sig=qKpjQl_lYcmAX4z_Eyf1Hqa_V7I&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result#PPA58,M1

Suggest you paste the link into your browser.