I am especially interested to hear about how the architecture of the clubhouse might compare (or contrast) with the course architecture of these golf clubs... i.e., does a modern golf course design dictate a contemporary building?
Great to have an architect here.
I have only played The Bridge and that was very early on before the clubhouse. It is an eclectic place in a very cool way, as Bob Rubin left traces of the old Bridgehampton raceway around the property. Then he built the clubhouse (I believe he went back to school and got a degree but he was not the architect) clearly trying to be the anti-tradition type of club. I am told that the course has evolved, but originally it was more parkland/Pine Valley with great views of Peconic Bay. The club has been enormously successful financially, especially in comparison to some others.
My view of Sebonnack, which I have not played but have seen from National and being on the property years before it was a golf course, is that it is the Modern Shinnecock. It may take 25 years of maturity for the snobs here at GCA to embrace it as "in the same league" with its neighbors, but it seems to have that potential along with Friars Head.
I don't know the Jersey courses, but they obviously took different paths and their clubhouses seem to reflect those different paths.
John K,
I really don't think people here think about this stuff nearly as much as you think. Today all the kids are out of school, not just the Jewish kids. So in New York, I think you can make the argument that we are all a little Jewish and after being here close to twenty years I honestly don't know what that means. It is just part of the fabric of life. My wife is half Jewish and I would probably say she is less Jewish than me.
My older son is now in Bar Mitvah season and the architecture of the venues has or will range from Chelsea Piers a sports facilty to the Modern Museum of Science to a Castle in Westchester. I see no pattern of similarity at all.