230 yds over water and the green needs bunkers to protect it? I'd be begging for my ball to get into either of the bunkers.
David,
That was my initial thoughts on the bunkers as well, but then I noticed that the bail out area is so generous, and thatt he internal contours of the green seem to be very strait forward. With all that I felt that this green does need bunkering, but not so much.
I don't get the logic. How large bail out area justify or make necessary a bunker directly between the tee and the hole on a 230 yard carry over water? I think those bunkers make the hole easier, not harder, which is why I said I would be hoping my ball got into the bunker.
I also considered that you never hear anyone object to the bunkering around the great scenic par threes at Cyprus Point.
I think some here have complained about he bunkers on CPC especially at Cypress as being unnecessary eye candy. Given that they are cut out of sand dune, I think they are just fine.
But to the point, the bunkers at CPC are not directly between the tee and the green. If there was a bunker immediately short of the green at CPC 16, it would take the teeth completely out of the hole. As it is, even a shot a couple of feet short of the green will ricochet into the crashing waves. If there was a similar bunker as in the photo, the golfer could be a club short of the green and have a chance at Par.
If anything, bunkers would make more sense if they were really only in play for the person who laid up well left.
__________________________
I don't understand holes like this in such a beautiful setting. It just looks phony to me, I expect a cruise ship to float up and use the golf hole as a dock.
And where is the next tee?