“The bike ride had to be before Lloyd moved into Allgates. When did you say that was? 1910? Why do I suspect you'll be pushing that date well back?”
David:
Good find about where Francis and Lloyd lived in 1910. Did they also live in the same places in 1911??
When everyone sees the size of the house at Allgates I’m sure they could understand he may not have moved in for a few years after buying the original 25 acres in 1910. Frankly, I didn’t know where Lloyd lived before 1910, so that new info is interesting in and of itself, at least.
But the fact he lived nearby doesn’t change anything as far as I’m concerned as to the date of that bike ride being in 1910 or 1911. What does very much interest me is the entirety of Francis’ story about that bike ride land swap idea and all he said about it. What also very much interests me is what Alan Wilson says in his report about the creation of Merion, as I've always said on these threads. When talking to some of the people who run Merion yesterday these are also the things that seem to concern them about the way your essay reads.
Here's Francis’s story again in its entirety:
"Except for many hours over a drawing board, running instruments in the field and just plain talking, I made but one important contribution to the LAYOUT of the golf course.
The land was shaped like a capital "L" and it was not very difficult to get the first 13 holes into the upright portion---with the help of a little ground on the north side of Ardmore Avenue---but the last five holes were another question.
I was looking at a map of the property one night when I had an idea. Not realizing it was nearly midnight, I called Mr Lloyd on the telephone, found he had not gone to bed, got on my bicycle and rode a mile or so to see him. The idea was this: We had some property west of the present course which did not fit in at all with any golf layout. Perhaps we could swap it for some we could use?
Mr. Lloyd agreed. The land now covered by fine homes along Golf House Road was exchanged for land about 130 yards wide by 190 yards long---the present location of the 15th green and the 16th tee. Within a day or two, the quarryman had his drills up where the the 16th green now is and blasted off the top of the hill so that, the green could be built as it is today."
And here is perhaps the most indicative parts of Alan Wilson’s report about the creation of Merion East and West describing what Hugh Wilson and his committee did in that creation:
“There were unusual and interesting features connected with the beginnings of these two courses which should not be forgotten. First of all, they were both “Homemade”. When it was known that we must give up the old course, a “Special Committee on New Golf Grounds”—composed of the late Frederick L. Baily. S.T. Bodine, E.C. Felton, H.G. Lloyd, and Robert Lesley, Chairman, chose the site; and a “Special Committee” DESIGNED and BUILT the two courses without the help of a golf architect. Those two good and kindly sportsmen, Charles B. MacDonald and H.J. Whigam, the men who conceived the idea of and designed the National Links at Southampton, both ex-amateur champions and the latter a Scot who had learned his golf at Prestwick—twice came to Haverford, first to go over the ground and later to consider and advise about our plans. They also had our committee as their guests at the National and their advice and suggestions were of the greatest help and value. Except for this, the entire responsibility for the DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION of the two courses rests upon the special Construction Committee, composed of R.S. Francis, R.E. Griscom, H.G. Lloyd. Dr. Harry Toulmin, and the late Hugh I. Wilson, Chairman.
The land for the East Course was found in 1910 and as a first step, Mr. Wilson was sent abroad to study the famous links in Scotland and England. On his return the plan was gradually evolved and while largely helped by many excellent suggestions and much good advice from the other members of the Committee, they have each told me that he is the person in the main responsible for the ARCHITECTURE of this and the West Course. Work was started in 1911 and the East Course was open for play on September 14th, 1912. The course at once proved so popular and membership and play increased so rapidly that it was decided to secure more land and build the West Course which was done the following year.
These two committees had either marked ability and vision or else great good luck---probably both—for as the years go by and the acid test of play has been applied, it becomes quite clear that they did a particularly fine piece of work.”
Some on here may not be aware of your lack of logic in ASSUMING that land swap event happened in 1910 instead of 1911, as is far more logical, but these following points should make that more clear:
1. You have conveniently assumed that Hugh Wilson who was the chairman did nothing until his committee was appointed in Jan, 1911. Your assumption is that he could not have done anything with a routing and design BECAUSE his committee HAD NOT been appointed until Jan. 1911.
2. But yet you DON’T make the same assumption about two people who would serve on the committee beginning in 1911 under Wilson----eg Francis and Lloyd!
One logically asks oneself why that is? The only logical reason most can see is that you have to do that to maintain your assumption that Macdonald routed the course when you ASSUME that Francis and Lloyd were out there in 1910 “tweaking” Macdonald’s routing by their participation ALONE in this land-swap idea in 1910 that shows on that November 1910 plan in your piece,
Frankly, #2 would be a bit more believable if you hadn’t made the assumption you did in #1, but everyone can certainly see you made that ASSUMPTION in #1 merely to make Hugh Wilson look like a complete novice beginning in Jan, 1911.
3. When one reads Francis’ words; “"Except for many hours over a drawing board, running instruments in the field and just plain talking, I made but one important contribution to the LAYOUT of the golf course.”, one certainly wonders if Francis was doing all that in 1910 as you suggest, who were those people he was talking to and why was he spending many hours over a drawing board and running instruments in the field BEFORE Hugh Wilson and HE AND Lloyd had been appointed to that committee to do the very things Francis is describing??
4. Francis also informs us; “The land was shaped like a capital "L" and it was not very difficult to get the first 13 holes into the upright portion---with the help of a little ground on the north side of Ardmore Avenue---but the last five holes were another question.” That certainly sounds to me and to most people who understand this story and Alan Wilson’s report that thirteen holes had ALREADY been done to their satisfaction either on a plan or actually built on the ground when those last five holes became a problem! Could that have happened in 1910 too, in your opinion, months BEFORE the committee was EVEN appointed AND about six or more months before the course went into construction in the spring of 1911??
5. And, then, YOUR ASSUMPTION of the explanation of the resolution created by that late night land swap idea of Francis’ when he says: “Within a day or two, the quarryman had his drills up where the the 16th green is and blasted off the top of the hill so that, the green could be built as it is today.", is to assign to it HYPERBOLE on Francis’ part since the blasting on that hole logically never would have taken place until probably late in the summer of 1911 when the course was nearing completion.
6. Your progression of these events in 1910 in your essay seems to try to lead anyone to conclude that there must have been a 1910 two-man phantom committee (Francis and Lloyd
) that was never actually appointed, and certainly NEVER mentioned in the history of Merion in any way, shape or form!! You ask us to ASSUME that Francis and Lloyd were out there ALONE to carry out some comprehensive “design and routing tweaking” effort of a Macdonald routing and design BEFORE the committee they would serve on to create the course was formed in 1911.
I think most who know ALL the surrounding historical information of the creation of Merion, including Alan Wilson’s report, understand YOU MUST do this or a Macdonald routing and design would essentially have no credibility at all because of the realities of actual timelines!----eg that it really was Wilson and his committee that did all this as reflected in Alan Wilson’s report which of course you ALSO have to dismiss or ignore in your essay to maintain your conclusion!
7. Not to mention that the two men you assign this really illogical occurrence to---eg Francis and Lloyd----NEVER even insinuated such a thing occurred in 1910 pervious to the creation of Hugh Wilson’s committee. On the contrary, THEY WERE ALSO the ones Alan Wilson was referring to when he said in his report: “…..and while largely helped by many excellent suggestions and much good advice from the other members of the Committee, THEY HAVE EACH TOLD ME that HE (H. Wilson) is the person in the main responsible for the ARCHITECTURE of this and the West Course.” To this remark by Alan Wilson you and seemingly some others on here, simply ASSUME that Alan Wilson must have been totally unfactual in saying that (basically lying, in fact) merely to glorify his brother. And, even more illogically, that others who were very much still alive to read it, including Francis and Lloyd (and Toulmin), must have ALL been in on this massive glorification gig to distort facts, as well.
It is not that Merion and those who run it are not interested in knowing if Macdonald had more to do with their course than they realized----they really are interested in that----but it is definitely the totally illogical way your essay bends and distorts events and Merion reports to try to show how he did. Perhaps you don't mind dismissing, distorting or ignoring Alan Wilson's words and his report on the creation of Merion to your convenience but Merion and some of us certainly do mind!
No sir, David, those who I spoke to from Merion yesterday who are the ones who essentially run that club and who have read some of this and are familiar with ALL of Merion’s history just sort of shook their heads and rolled their eyes, not about your subject, per se, but about the lack of logic or your essay as it attempted to shift important surrounding and relevant events and progressions and dismiss, ignore and explain away the recorded history of those things and therir various interrelating timelines to make it convenient to reinterpret it this way---eg THAT Macdonald routed and designed Merion East and that Wilson and his committee basically just constructed the course to that Macdonald routing and desigin plan.
Frankly, most of them from yesterday at HVGC (The Baily Cup (that's Frederick Baily of the 1910 Merion search committee, by the way
) between HVGC, Merion, Pine Valley, GMGC) who’ve looked at GOLFCLUBALTAS.com recently were much more interesting in discussing this effort to restore Cobb’s Creek! One of them even asked me, with a wink, if this man thinks Macdonald routed and designed that course too!