Tiger, I used to know some of the basics about the use of a small portion of our own State pension fund, which I believe was an "enterprise" fund, used to promote "start-up" or retain burgeoning business enterprizes that benefit Wisconsin.
But, isn't the bar rather high in the fiduciary sense for the managers of such public employee pension funds, to invest with a high degree of due diligence regarding the soundness of the investment? In the matter of a grand vision of a State golf trail, while the idea is certainly a good one to promote a State with a popular tourist attraction that also provides great recreation and beauty space in the outdoors, it also might be hard to project soundness of the investment at 6-10 million a course, that would yield a relatively safe or predictable return. But, as these designated small portions of these huge funds are cut out to be more risk-reward oriented as they are designed to promote intra-state business and promote the State in general, I think it 'could' be worth while for other States to pursue. It could also be disasterous for 'some' States due to the wide disparity of land acquisition costs varied throughout the States, regional labor costs, etc.
I think a State pension fund sponsored trail was proposed in Nebraska as well.
There just seems to be a number of 'other' considerations beyond the narrow desire for golfers to have more venues, including some areas that are overbuilt already, thus might not be a good investment.