Did you ever play a hole and walk away thinking that something about the hole was counter intuitive ?
The 5th hole at Adios comes to mind.
It's a par 4 dogleg left around water.
But, the optimal angle of attack to the green is from a point about 180 yards off the tee.
Golfers who hit driver straight, into the fairway are faced with a green that sits diagonally, with bunkers front and rear with water left. Yet the golfer hitting driver faces a riskier shot off the tee, contending with water left and OB right, whereas the golfer hitting a medium to long iron off the tee are relatively insulated from those two fates.
Yet, they are rewarded with an ideal angle of attack into the green, with the bunkers flanking the green left and right, with the green rising toward them from front to back.
Whereas, the angle of attack into the green from the middle of the fairway at driver distance is awkward at best.
Should a golfer who hits the riskier driver be rewarded with a prefered angle of attack into the green ? Or penalized, as he is in this situation ?
How would the first time golfer know this ?
Was this a design faux pax or was it deliberate ?
A look at Google Earth will help you understand the design.
The hole is the one in the upper right hand corner of the golf course.
It's in Coconut Creek, FL, between Boca Raton and Deerfield, right next to the Florida Turnpike.