Ray,
A good friend of mine played in a Tour pro-am with Mark Calc. and told me that the guy was a world-class A--hole. Yet, I know that Calc has a fine reputation with many people who know him well. What am I to believe? That Calc is fallible? Boy, does he have company!
Bob Huntley can speak to this much better than I can, but during the days of apartheid, Player got a lot of crap throughout the world for his country's treatment of the native population when he himself was an irritant to his government by the way he treated his many African employees and for his public stance of supporting change. Player may not have been political enough for some, but from what I've read, there was no mistake where he stood.
Not well known today, but in the early days of the modern tour when foreign players started to make some serious strides in the U.S., they experienced opposition and hostility from some domestic professionals. While these were mostly second-tier players, they resented "foreigners" coming to the U.S. and taking money from "our" purses. While the anti-foreign bias is still with us today in the overall economy, it is not as widespread on the Tour, though no doubt some remnants of sour grapes exist.
For those who believe that steroids and enhancement drugs are a problem in other professional sports but not in golf, what makes pro golfers different people? They seem to have problems with alcohol, divorce, anger management, etc. Why not drugs?
Lastly, if Player has a bad attitude, please Lord, let me have just a little bit of it. Also, not being prolific in the top 100 lists = bad courses? Please, give me a break! The only course of his I've played (I think)- The Player Course at the Woodlands- is on a flat site but is full of strategy and variety, well-bunkered, challenging greens, and perfectly scaled to the surroundings. To the best of my knowledge, Jeff Brauer does not have a course in the top 100 either, but I've yet to play one bad course he's ever done.