I agree with Jim, Chris.
Sugarloaf Mountain occupies a very interesting property, which happens to be very unique to Florida. More important, the routing takes great advanatge of this property, resulting in a wonderfully varied collection of very playable, and at the same time, very challenging holes. Then, as is typical with Coore and Crenshaw and co.'s work, features sit so subtly and so elegantly on the ground, there.
The course suits my tastes. As you know, golf course architecture is very subjective. While you're underwhelmed by the photos, I find the course to be extremely well done, and extremely attractive. And, as Jim says, it's not overly similar to other Coore and Crenshaw courses I've played, including Friar's Head, Sand Hills, and Chechessee Creek Club. In fact, I find much of Sugarloaf very different from the courses just listed.
I simply contend that, indeed, Sugarloaf Mountain is a very solid effort... certainly not the greatest course built since the latest greatest. The idea people will simply praise a course because it's designed by Coore and Crenshaw, or whoever else, doesn't even register with me.