Greg:
I feel your pain. I'm not really happy that the course I co-designed is nearly 7500 yards, but I got outvoted 2 to 1 on that part.
I think this sets a horrible precedent. I've recently done a plan for a new course that would be 6700 yards from the back (par 70) which is all they should ever need ... but I'm sure the client will tell me it HAS to be longer in order to win awards, stand the test of time, or whatever. I know what he'll really be saying is that he can't sell expensive memberships without a scorecard that shows how manly the members are (even though most of them will never play the course from all the way back), but when you look at a list like this, how do you argue.
I'm curious -- for the GOLF DIGEST panelists out there -- did any of you play a high-end private course this year that was UNDER 7,000 yards from the back tees?