Conspiracy theories and out to get the Cobb's Creek project? Who said anything on here about conspiracy theories and that you were out to get the Cobb's project?
What you said on here recently is that you felt that due to what Cirba said about Cobb's being known as the best public course in the country it was dishonest, counterproductive and disingenuous of him. Fine, that's your opinion but the fact that no one seems to agree with you has apparently gotten you hysterical once again----eg you keep claiming on here that people are mireading what you wrote, misunderstanding you, victimizing you etc.
The only conspiracy theories I'm aware of are what you and MacWood tried to label Merion and Wilson, sometimes Pine Valley and Crump, sometimes Cobbs and Philadelphia with in some attempt to preserve Philadelphia myths and lore and legends. You labelled those conspiracies and conspirators the "Philadelphia Syndrome", the "Philadelphia Posse" etc. There are no conspiracy theories of that nature around here that I've ever been aware of----it was all just a bunch of trumped up stuff you and MacWood generated on here for almost a decade now. I guess the reason you two did that with Philadelphia architecture and a few architects was to try to make a name for yourselves as some kind of researchers/historians and by trying to show up a few people who told you precisely why they disagreed with a number or your theories (read: your "Missing Faces of Merion" IMO piece).
The only thing you ever discovered was that Hugh Wilson did not go abroad in 1910, and we certainly gave you credit for that once it seemed apparent. But when we explained to you precisely why that made no difference at all to what he did in 1911 with Merion East you both just didn't want to accept it or even hear it. You accused some of us of lying, hiding important material, altering original documents and trying to bar the door of some clubs to the both of you. Nothing like that was remotely true but you just didn't want to accept it or even hear it.
What you tried to do just didn't work and it seems to make you endlessly defensive and hysterical, and your latest outburst is another criticism of Cirba by calling him dishonest, disingenuous and counterproductive. But if you two want to continue to throw shit on the wall, particularly about Philadelphia architects and architecture, then fine, but expect people, and particularly people from Philadelphia who know more about it than you two do to tell you both that you are throwing shit on the wall.
If there is anyone out there who agrees with you two I would welcome them coming forward or having you two name them----we would love to speak to them civilly and objectively about anything on their mind to do with the history of Philadelphia golf architecture. I don't think they will because I can't see there is anyone out there who agrees with you two at this point. And when they don't it seems all you are left with is to just continue to do what you've always done---lash out at, insult and blame people like Cirba and Morrison and me.