Ken,
that is a scorchingly good question! Please let me tell you why.
I tell everyone who will listen(!) that if God (or any suitable substitute deity of choice) tells me in my sleep tonight that I must choose only ONE golf course to play for the remainder of my time on the rock, (which may be a day, a year or all eternity), I will always, Always, ALWAYS choose Gleneagles Kings - above even a certain California golf course!
That remains the case!
Loch Lomond GC is truly magnificent. It is a marvellous blend of class, style, design, landscape fit, golf challenge, any number of great qualities.
Here, I had typed a great discourse of architectural interest. But, you know what? It wasn't THAT important.
What IS important is that LLGC PROVES conclusively: that trees work on golf courses; that it is possible to build a VERY high quality golf course on CLAY!; that a high quality of friendly service is the BEST way to operate such a facility; that exclusivity might actually be a workable business model; and that Seaside Links courses are NOT necessarily the ONLY model that must be followed slavishly. Garden Smith really, really, really was WRONG!
FBD.