I expect an above average conditioned golf course, which often times can mean too much money was spent moving dirt around creating containment mounding and catch basins (which will function well when it comes to repelling water, which is intergral to above average conditioning
)
The course will more than likely consist of two loops of nine, four par 5 and 3s, and nary a drivable par four. There may or may not be a great deal of strategy in the driving game, the bunkering will probably be more penal than strategic.
Like his pops, a Jr. course will probably adhere to the "tough par, easy bogey" standard. I expect to encounter quite a bit of water, I will not be surprised IN THE LEAST to find an all-water carry par 3. The greens will have some good-sized lumps and a few interesting pin placements, but nothing will probably strike me as utterly trendsetting, timeless or uber unique.
I imagine most of Jr's courses occupying average to above average pieces of land, yet there will be something kinda stale about the whole picture, leaving the most critical of eyes feeling slightly let down......yet you wouldn't even know where to start, because the basic "style" of design permeates over every acre of the property.
To be fair....I like our local course here in Portland, Heron Lakes Great Blue, quite a lot. It is a Jr. design. I recently read the design associate was Kyle Phillips, which may or may not say something about the final product.
Other than that I echo RJ Daley's thoughts; Chamber's Bay is looking fantastic and I am absolutely pumped up to check it out. But it seems a deviation from the norm which is v ery refreshing to see. Jay Blasi probably deserves a lot of credit.