An interesting debate and one that is hard to separate myself from, as Meadow is so personal to me.
I will refrain from a hole-by-hole, but I think there are a number of similarities and differences to the two, mainly that there are too many trees at both, which detract from the original intent and visual aesthetics of both of them. Pasa probably has more dramatic holes on it, due to the dramatic terrain but Meadow's vistas (especially where trees don't impinge on them) are all-world -- it is pretty amazing that when the sun goes down, the only light you see is on the clubhouse porch!
I am particularly fond of the green contours at both, although I think Pasa is regularly kept too fast for its slopes (I haven't played there in 6-8 years, but continue to hear how fast they keep them, which negates the fun of them, specifically the 16th). Holes at Meadow that I really like include: 1, 4, 5, 6 (particularly if the trees get removed), 7, 9, 10G, 15, 16, 17, and 18. At Pasa, 2 approach, 3 (tough!), 5, 10, 11, 12 greensite, 14 fairway gully, 15, 16 for history, and 18 with some vegetation removed. Pasa gets very cramped by housing throughout the course and Meadow is a narrow golf course in places with the trees, although originally its intent was to be the Old Course in America, so all those angles were available to use without the trees. I think Meadow may be slightly more original: the only green to be altered was #3 by the members quite a while ago and I rebuilt it due to agronomic issues and pitch, and the trees -- all the contours in and around the greens were still in place. Not sure what all is non original at Pasa, besides modifications to #11 green and tee placements at #2, 9, and 10? Tom, is that correct?
I think they are both wonderful golf courses and I appreciate all the nice compliments.
Best,
Mike