News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Matt_Cohn

  • Karma: +0/-0
In My Opinion: San Francisco
« on: January 25, 2007, 02:25:32 AM »
I'm making plans to write my second "In My Opinion" piece for GCA. The topic will be a comparison of the great golf courses in close proximity around Lake Merced in San Francisco.

Definitely to be included are Olympic-Lake and SFGC, which I've played once each; Harding Park, which I've played about 10 times; and Lake Merced, which I played for the first time today.

Two questions about courses I have not played:

1. Cal Club. I know it's a great layout. I'm thinking of excluding it from my piece based solely on geography. Good idea, or bad idea?

2. Olympic-Ocean. It doesn't have the reputation of the other five golf courses I've mentioned. But again, I've not played it. Should I wait to include it in my piece?

Mike Benham

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2007, 03:14:03 AM »
The Cal Club is actually called the California Golf Club of San Francisco, so perhaps you should include it !!!!   ;)

As for the layout being "great", that may be an exaggeration.

And the Olympic Ocean, your opinions would be interesting to hear.

Mike
"... and I liked the guy ..."

Bill_McBride

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2007, 09:26:07 AM »
Matt, I agree with Mike, you should play the Ocean Course before writing about it.  I've only played it once and recall it is a bit like a course designed by a committee.  I recall mentioning to one of the members that it was like Tom Weiskopf did a routing plan and then gave three teams of shapers six holes each to build, each in a different style.  There is certainly some interesting topography!
« Last Edit: January 25, 2007, 09:26:38 AM by Bill_McBride »

David_Tepper

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2007, 09:42:31 AM »
Matt -

I would suggest sticking with the 4 courses (Harding, OC Lake, SFGC & Lake Merced) you identified as one distinct group.

The Cal Club belongs to different group - courses on the Peninsula between highways 101 & 280. That group includes Burlingame, Green Hills, Peninsula, Sharon Heights, Stanford and a few others.    

The Ocean Course is "sui generis."  It has been changed SO many times over the past 50+ years that you really can't put it in the first group. It does not have the history or the continuity.

DT

Tom Huckaby

Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2007, 09:57:23 AM »
I'd say however you do it, it will be darn interesting.  But I also think David Tepper assessed this perfectly.

And if you are including SFGC, well you have played it post-Doakification, right?  If not, best to wait until you have.  

TH

Jon Spaulding

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2007, 12:44:59 PM »
I look forward to the piece. I know the Cliffs course may be a stretch, but it would nice to see it included.

You might consider the Ocean course as a piece unto itself. Not very familiar with the original but what I have seen is intriguing. The Ocean holes added in the 90's sure were interesting for the time they existed.
You'd make a fine little helper. What's your name?

PThomas

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2007, 12:47:58 PM »
199 played, only Augusta National left to play!

Matt_Cohn

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2007, 01:21:51 PM »
Paul and Tom,

Not only post-doakified, but also retillinghasted.

Tom Huckaby

Re:In My Opinion: San Francisco
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2007, 01:23:46 PM »
Paul and Tom,

Not only post-doakified, but also retillinghasted.

I like that better - well done!

I have not, btw. Need to rectify that.  Some day soon I hope...

TH