News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Mark_F

Hazards, Temptation and Percentages
« on: December 12, 2006, 02:33:37 AM »
If a hazard that guards the ideal line isn't that tempting to take on most of the time to most of the people who play it, is it an effective hazard?


Mark_F

Re:Hazards, Temptation and Percentages
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2006, 02:51:30 AM »
Sean,

It was Mr Shackelford, from memory, who has written an essay on temptation.

Surely a hazard has to offer the seductive promise of advantage if conquered?

If the temptation isn't there, then the hazard is too fierce, or located incorrectly?  Either that, or the tee is?

Jeff_Brauer

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Hazards, Temptation and Percentages
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2006, 08:24:38 AM »
Mark,

I have always thought so.  For all of us average players who think we know what better players who are concerned about score should do, the simple facts are that as in team sports, defense wins championships much more often than completing the long bomb.

If a challenge hazard was a full stroke penalty, like an unraked bunker ten feet deep, the chance of losing a stroke - or more - intuitively is about twice as great as picking one up. Who would take that chance?  Make that a smooth, medium shallow bunker that might cause you troubles, but probably won't, and the risk taking goes way up as the risk goes down.

Naturally, we would want to avoid a hazard that is virtually no risk at all, although many golfers don't feel that way.
Jeff Brauer, ASGCA Director of Outreach