Regarding Lederach and lost balls -- I don't see it that way.
Matt-
I'm jumping in for my little buddy.
I love Lederach--it's thought-provoking and probably the best overall test of golf for my money currently, but your statement doesn't hold water. Period.
OB, or areas with wetlands and densely clustered brush (read: lost ball) exists on 1,2,3,4,6,8,9,11,18. That's a lot. Granted, in some of those cases, you have to hit a really piss-poor shot, but it happens. In some of those cases, you can hit a decent shot, but get a bad bounce one way or another and be totally f**ked--the ball kicks directly right or left into red stakes. This has happened to me several times coming into #6 green. Maybe you find it, maybe you don't. Either way, it's a pain in the a** and disheartening, at that.
This actually is my main question against Lederach--a lot of it works so well, as far as the overall architecture, but I don't know how well if it were very fast and firm, with the opportunity for the ball to get a bad bounce and disappear in a hazard so frequently.
In contrast, it's harder to lose a ball at Jeffersonville. Back on the other side of the Delaware, Royce Brook comes to mind--in many cases, it's hard to lose a ball there, although the terrain, architecture, and maintenance contribute to this as well.
Look, if there's internal OB or whatever, fine. Give me my penalty. But it's a pain in the a** to have to dig into the bag for another ball and reload, and golf balls are expensive. It's no fun to lose them.
That was a funny statement from you, considering you hit a few(?) drives OB at GCGC before finding the fairway and calling it "an easy driving course".
Would you say Lederach as a course would be a fair comparison somewhat with Royce Brook, as a far as a moderately high-end public course?