News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Tim Taylor

  • Karma: +0/-0
Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« on: June 19, 2006, 07:31:37 AM »
With all the Phil-brain-fart, Monty-collapses threads I thought it was worth simply saying congratulations to the winner.

Ogilvy has been building up to something great all year: winning the Match Play, second at Honda, top 16 at the Masters, 12 of 15 cuts, vaulting into the world top 20.

He can bomb it, he displayed a great short game, and he's had interesting things to say about architecture, equipment, and the direction of the game.

I find him an easy guy to root for.

Tim

Mike_Sweeney

Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2006, 07:44:05 AM »
Should the Pink Poulter be given some credit for Ogilvy's win? From the NYT's.



OGILVY LOST IN SIDESHOW Geoff Ogilvy had to win the United States Open to get any attention. He was paired in the final round with Ian Poulter, who showed up Sunday looking like a stick of Bazooka Bubble Gum. Poulter's pink shirt, pink pants and Pepto Bismol-pink golf bag elicited more reaction from the gallery on the front nine than Ogilvy's red numbers.

When Poulter and the 29-year-old Ogilvy arrived at the par-4 eighth green, a fan yelled to Poulter, "Does your husband play?" Poulter produced a quick retort that sent a wave of laughter through the greenside bunker. There was not so much as a shout-out for Ogilvy, who at that point was two-under-par for the day and the leader at one-over-par for the tournament.

It was like that on every hole, with The Pink Poulter being greeted by wolf whistles, smooching sounds and a version of "The Pink Panther" theme song. The crowd quips ran the gamut from the silly ("Poulter, nice pants. It's Father's Day, not Mother's Day." And, "Where's your purse?") to the supportive ("Go Ian: real men wear pink!"). Poulter's get-up was so colorful, nobody seemed to notice that Ogilvy was making a charge.

"It was almost like he was a little sideshow to Poulter," said Gus Seebeck, the general manager of the Australasian PGA Tour who followed the Ogilvy-Poulter group. "Even after those two birdies, I didn't think he was getting necessarily any more attention from the crowds."

« Last Edit: June 19, 2006, 07:45:03 AM by Mike Sweeney »

Andrew Thomson

Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2006, 07:47:49 AM »
Quote
Poulter produced a quick retort that sent a wave of laughter through the greenside bunker.

what was the retort?

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2006, 09:31:20 AM »
Geoff wasn't getting any attention from NBC either. They completely missed the story as it developed. When have you seen the broadcast nearly completely ignore the eventual winner? I watched a while on Saturday while Geoff was right up there on the leaderboard and they were not showing him at all! Since I was pulling for him I kept wondering if he had posted some big numbers and fallen back. But every time the leaderboard came up, there was his name. The guy won the match play for gosh sakes. He should have been on their radar!
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

George Pazin

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2006, 09:39:26 AM »
Garland, I concur. How about missing Geoff's chip in on 17 live, being away at commercial?

Way to go, Geoff. 2 tremendous pars to win.
Big drivers and hot balls are the product of golf course design that rewards the hit one far then hit one high strategy.  Shinny showed everyone how to take care of this whole technology dilemma. - Pat Brockwell, 6/24/04

Dan Kelly

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #5 on: June 19, 2006, 09:45:29 AM »
Geoff wasn't getting any attention from NBC either. They completely missed the story as it developed. When have you seen the broadcast nearly completely ignore the eventual winner? I watched a while on Saturday while Geoff was right up there on the leaderboard and they were not showing him at all!

That's just not true.

They showed Ogilvy enough on Saturday that, seeing how well he was playing, I predicted to my daughter that he would win the Open.

Full disclosure: I recanted that prediction when he and his caddie got into their little snit -- also on Saturday.

Did they show ENOUGH shots of anyone but Mickelson? No. They never show enough shots of anyone but Woods and Mickelson. But I don't think they ignored Ogilvy any more than they ignored, say, Furyk or Harrington.

Did anyone see a single shot from Jeff Sluman?

"There's no money in doing less." -- Joe Hancock, 11/25/2010
"Rankings are silly and subjective..." -- Tom Doak, 3/12/2016

Stu Grant

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #6 on: June 19, 2006, 11:43:13 AM »
Though they could  have showed more of some of the contenders down the stretch, kudos to NBC for NOT showing much of Furyk's pre-putting routine.  They did a great job of just cutting in so we could see Furyk actually putting the ball instead of watching his annoying lining-up then stepping away and doing it all over again.  Although I'm sure Jim's a great guy and I respect his tremendous ability, I sure didn't want to watch him in an 18-hole US open playoff for that reason.    

Garland Bayley

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2006, 11:56:51 AM »
...
Way to go, Geoff. 2 tremendous pars to win.
Actually, wasn't it more like 7 consecutive pars to win. At WFW in this open, that has to be considered a run at the lead! How many times were the last 5 holes played in even par by the whole field throughout the tournament? Was there even a significant percentage that accomplished that?
"I enjoy a course where the challenges are contained WITHIN it, and recovery is part of the game  not a course where the challenge is to stay ON it." Jeff Warne

Glenn Spencer

Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2006, 12:09:53 PM »
...
Way to go, Geoff. 2 tremendous pars to win.
Actually, wasn't it more like 7 consecutive pars to win. At WFW in this open, that has to be considered a run at the lead! How many times were the last 5 holes played in even par by the whole field throughout the tournament? Was there even a significant percentage that accomplished that?


I believe he bogeyed 14. Makes what Ryan Moore accomplished in the 2004 Amateur look all the better. The coverage was terrible, hardly saw Montgomerie hit a tee shot until 18.

Doug Wright

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re:Congrats Geoff Ogilvy
« Reply #9 on: June 19, 2006, 12:52:06 PM »
I liked Ogilvy's comments after about the course (paraphrasing):  "You have to look at each hole from the green backwards to play this course" meaning the greens and pin placements at WFW really dictate the correct play. I think that speaks volumes for his maturity in this day of bomb it and find it golf, and why he carried the day.
Twitter: @Deneuchre