News:

This discussion group is best enjoyed using Google Chrome, Firefox or Safari.

Pages: 1 [2]

TEPaul

Re: An architect's dilema
« Reply #25 on: November 09, 2002, 05:45:23 AM »
I don't know exactly how many shots I'm going to get from Hartman--at least 10 per round, though, and of course if that Parvenik character happens to be there I definitely need at least 20 from him because there's no doubt he'll be beating Hartman by 10 per round! But I wasn't playing in the Philly Open at PVGC either, so according to Pat's logic maybe I need more than 10 from Hartman and 20 from Parvenik per round!

Let's see, if I can manage to shoot 75 I'm not sure if I can nip Hartman but I'm probably not going to be able to handle that Parvenik because I'm quite sure he can do better than 55 at Dornoch!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:11 PM by -1 »
Logged

Patrick_Mucci

Re: An architect's dilema
« Reply #26 on: November 09, 2002, 05:53:22 AM »
TEPaul,

As the starter, at the USOPEN, announces your name and your playing resume, many in the gallery are heard to whisper, who is that guy.  Some GCA'ers in the gallery respond, he's the guy whose knees are knocking so badly, he sounds like a drummer in a rock band.  10 and 20 shots won't be enough. ;D
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
Logged

TEPaul

Re: An architect's dilema
« Reply #27 on: November 09, 2002, 06:20:28 AM »
Pat:

If I ever tee it up in the US Open, you got that right 10 and 20 shots sure as hell won't be enough against Hartman or Parvenik. But then again, I ain't exactly Hartman either!

Just one last question though. How did Hartman do against Parvenik in the US Open at Pebble in 2000?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by 1056376800 »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
Tags:
Tags:

An Error Has Occurred!

Call to undefined function theme_linktree()
Back