One thing I get very bored of is listening to the "Well, if it were in the [insert here--Phila/NYC/LI/Chicago/whatever] area it wouldn't make the top 50" attitude...
The fact is that Sahalee wouldn't, but it isn't!
In reality there probably isn't a course within 350 miles of here that should make any Top 50 or Top 100 lists, which (on the one hand) makes me sad, but (on the other hand) really who cares! Everything in life is cyclical, and perhaps some truly ground-breaking courses will be built up here in the next half-century, and this won't be an issue in 2050.
What difference does it make where the PGA puts their tournament really--if they want to go to cutting edge places, great--if they want to grab the cash and secure sites for PGAs/Ryder Cups, great---I think they should be, and their sites should be, more distinct from the US Open rota anyway. Their course set-ups seem to suggest a gentle trend in this location...
My like/not so like opinion of Sahalee is that the routing and individual holes are not particularly inspiring, in my opinion. The blueprint of some Ted Robinson holes in Palm Desert, the East Bay, etc. is nearly identical to the ones at Sahalee, so I'm not sure that the course on the ground is particularly note-worthy. If that were the only criteria for tournament selection, then I think Sahalee comes up short...
However, the visual presentation of Sahalee to the golfer and to the TV viewer is quite stunning, and I would say is quite different than the run of the mill TPC-clone we get so often for these tourneys. How many times to we all complain about the same old thing on these televised tourneys?
Sahalee is a unique site, in that regard, and the contrasts offered visually are the best part of the track. The conditioning would be next, and that continues to improve over time. While I would not recommend a special trip to come see Sahalee, I would also not suggest anyone skip it on a golfing trip to the NW. Those trees are unbelievable in their scope, and present a near-religious experience not unlike walking through the Muir Woods in Marin, for example...
Whenever I am there, I just let the golf course details just flow along, and instead relish the opportunity to be in a different spot, enjoying a different type of golf experience, one that mirrors its location in the NW very nicely.
I also note that we spend a lot of time complaining about courses which are forced into their surrounds, a "links' course in a mountain setting, a "desert"-type target course in an urban/suburban setting, etc. Sahalee does not do that in the least, from the conditioning, which is NW green, to the architecture of the surrounding houses ("daylight ramblers" abound), to the amazing trees...
I would applaud Sahalee and the members for maintaining a course/club that is quite clearly uniquely Seattle---Not necessarily a Top 100 course, or even a "major-worthy" course, at least in my opinion--but a "noteworthy" club nonetheless...
Fair assessment?