News:

Welcome to the Golf Club Atlas Discussion Group!

Each user is approved by the Golf Club Atlas editorial staff. For any new inquiries, please contact us.


Patrick_Mucci

Re:Would Dr Mac and other "Golden Age'ers" be wasting their time ?
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2006, 12:47:17 PM »
TEPaul,

Everyone talks about deception and repeat play as if they hit their ball in the identical spot every time they play a hole, and that the course is set up the same every day and that weather and turf conditions are the same every day.

What a croc !

I want to know how a guy, who's playing NGLA for the second time, who sliced his ball far to the right on the second hole the first time around, knows how to play the shot from the left side of the fronting bunker sixty yards short of the green to a hole located:
A  five paces from the front of the green.
B  five paces from the back of the green
C  five paces from the right of the green
D  five paces from the left of the green
E  in the center of the green

The genius and beauty of the hole is that there are a variety of acceptable ways to play the shot and a number of ways NOT to play the shot, and having played the hole once or a dozen times won't necessarily enlighten you.

I could say the same thing about almost any hole at NGLA and other courses.

Many on this site also assume perfect execution, as if, having a general idea on how to play a shot will result in the perfect shot, never stopping to consider the consequences for the degrees of imperfect execution, which should be factored into shot selection in the first place.

If everybody's so smart after their first round at a golf course, why isn't there a steady progression of lower scores every time they tee it up subsequent to their first round

[size=8x]?[/size]
« Last Edit: January 15, 2006, 12:47:36 PM by Patrick_Mucci »

Chris Kane

Re:Would Dr Mac and other "Golden Age'ers" be wasting their time ?
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2006, 02:39:02 PM »
Tom Doak, almost all courses in Australia have yardages on the sprinkler heads, besides Barnbougle obviously.  Royal Melbourne was the the only sandbelt course without them for a while, but the shy fell in for them about eighteen months ago.

Dan King

Re:Would Dr Mac and other "Golden Age'ers" be wasting their time ?
« Reply #27 on: January 15, 2006, 03:05:15 PM »
Jeff_Mingay writes:
Imagine that, a former PGA Tour player in favour of no marks on the course!

Zokol should never be used as an example of a typical PGA Tour pro. You might as well cite the PGA pro formerly known as Mac O'Grady.

Dan King
Quote
I think golf carts take a little piece of golf's quality away. The tradition of the game is being passed by because revenue is the number one consideration. There's money in carts.
 --Richard Zokol

Tyler Kearns

Re:Would Dr Mac and other "Golden Age'ers" be wasting their time ?
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2006, 05:20:49 PM »
In so far as yardage markers are concerned, I do not see any harm in marking the sprinkler heads, and only the sprinkler heads. Purists can opt to not look, and players who rely upon them can have a peek.

You DON'T SEE the harm,
Or, you CHOOSE to ignore it ?
[/color]


Pat,

I DON'T SEE the harm to the purist, the visual deception will still exist because they play by feel, and read the landscape to judge the distance and/or club required.

The inclusion of yardage markers will not affect the way an architect designs a golf course, therefore the visual deceptions in their arsenal will continue to be used.

Have you never been forced to decide between the distance inscribed on a sprinkler head and the distance inferred by your visual read of the landscape? Even though we trust the irrigation head, doubt is still generated in the golfer's mind.

Could you please advise on the harm of opting to mark yardages on sprinkler heads?

TK

Tags: